Help With Partial Differentiation & Integration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of partial differentiation and integration, particularly in the context of d'Alembert's wave equation. Participants explore the relationships between differentiation and integration, and how these operations interact with respect to different variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Tom expresses confusion about differentiating a function with respect to time and integrating with respect to another variable, questioning whether he is recovering the original function.
  • Some participants explain the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and its implications for integration and differentiation.
  • There is a discussion about the correct application of differentiation and integration, with Tom questioning the validity of his professor's explanation regarding the operations.
  • Tom presents a specific example involving the function f(x) = 3x² and seeks clarification on the integration of its derivative with respect to time.
  • Participants challenge and refine each other's claims about the relationships between the variables and the operations being performed.
  • Some participants suggest that Tom may be misunderstanding the context of differentiation and integration in his problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct interpretation of the operations involving differentiation and integration. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the variables involved in differentiation and integration, as well as the specific context of the functions being discussed. Some mathematical steps and definitions are not fully clarified, contributing to the confusion.

tshafer
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I know I should know this... it looks so ridiculously easy. In the course of getting d'Alembert's wave equation solution, we get the following equation:

[tex]2cp'\left(x\right)=cf'\left(x\right)+g\left(x\right)[/tex]

The primes are derivatives wrt t. Then we re-order the equation and "integrate the relation" to get an expression for p:

[tex]p\left(\xi\right)=\frac{1}{2}f\left(\xi\right)+\frac{1}{2c}\int^{\xi}_{0}g\left(s\right)ds[/tex]

I have to be missing something very, very simple. How can I differentiate [tex]p\left(x\right)[/tex] wrt [tex]t[/tex] then integrate wrt something (x, I suppose, in this case) and recover the original function p? Or am I NOT recovering it... just something new named [tex]p\left(\xi\right)[/tex]? Thanks for the help!

Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Tom! :smile:

[tex]\int^{\xi}_{0}f'(x)dx\ =\ \left[f(x)\right]^{\xi}_{0}\ =\ f(\xi)\ -\ f(0)[/tex] :smile:
 
Alright, cool. Why is that true, though? If I have f(x) = 3x^2, differentiate wrt t and integrate wrt x from 0 to xi I don't think I will get 3(xi)^2?

Tom
 
f'(x) = 6x.

[tex]\int^{\xi}_{0} 6x dx\ =\ [3x^2]^{\xi}_{0}\ =\ 3\xi^2[/tex] :smile:

Integration is the opposite of differentiation …

that's how it works!​
 
The fancy name of what tiny-tim show you is "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus". You may wish to read up more about it :)
 
Yes... when it was covered waaaay back in Calc I, it was something more like:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int^{x}_{a}f\left(t\right)dt=f\left(x\right)-f\left(a\right)[/tex].

I was just concerned with differentiating wrt t AND integrating wrt x:
[tex]\int^{\xi}_{0}\frac{df\left(x\right)}{dt}dx[/tex]

I felt like I had variables flying everywhere, hehe. Thanks!

Tom
 
Last edited:
tshafer said:
Yes... when it was covered waaaay back in Calc I, it was something more like:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\int^{x}_{a}f\left(t\right)dt=f\left(x\right)-f\left(a\right)[/tex].

I was just concerned with differentiating wrt t AND integrating wrt x:
[tex]\int^{\xi}_{0}\frac{df\left(x\right)}{dt}dx[/tex]

I felt like I had variables flying everywhere, hehe. Thanks!

Tom

Your first formula is incorrect I believe. You should only be left with f(x) and I believe you want [tex]\frac{d}{dx}[/tex] instead of [tex]\frac{d}{dt}[/tex]. The "general" version of this

Let

[tex]F(x) = \int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt[/tex]

Then

[tex]F'(x) = f(h(x)) h'(x) - f(g(x)) g'(x)[/tex]
 
alright... thanks.

now, here's the thing... this all makes sense, except in my problem.

I have [tex]f(x) = 3x^{2}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{df}{dt}=f'\left(x\right) = 6x\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]\int^{\xi}_{0}6x\frac{dx}{dt}dx[/tex] = ??

or am I waaay confused?
 
Last edited:
If you are doing implicit differentiation you should get [tex]6x \frac{dx}{dt}[/tex] (minor error).
 
  • #10
My bad, just in a hurry. Still... [tex]\frac{dx}{dt}dx[/tex]??
 
  • #11
Ok, I am an idiot... these aren't t-derivatives, I guess.

[tex]u\left(x,t\right)=p\left(x+ct\right)+q\left(x-ct\right)=p\left(\xi\right)+q\left(\eta\right)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}\right|_{t=0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial \xi}\right|_{t=0}\frac{\partial \xi}{\partial t}\right|_{t=0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial \eta}\right|_{t=0}\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}\right|_{t=0}[/tex]

but [tex]\xi=\left(x+ct\right)\right|_{t=0}=x[/tex], same for [tex]\eta[/tex]. So...

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}\right|_{t=0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial \xi}{\partial t}\right|_{t=0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}\right|_{t=0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\cdot c + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\cdot \left(-c\right)[/tex]

So [tex]p'\left(x\right)=\frac{dp}{dx}[/tex], not [tex]\frac{dp\left(x\right)}{dt}[/tex].

Does that seem correct?
Tom
 
  • #12
tshafer said:
Alright, cool. Why is that true, though? If I have f(x) = 3x^2, differentiate wrt t and integrate wrt x from 0 to xi I don't think I will get 3(xi)^2?

Tom
Surely that's not what you meant! If you differentiate f(x) wrt t, you get 0. Integrating that with respect to x still gives 0.
 
  • #13
Exactly... yet my professor was adamant. I'm sure now that he didn't understand my question.
 
  • #14
tshafer said:
alright... thanks.

now, here's the thing... this all makes sense, except in my problem.

I have [tex]f(x) = 3x^{2}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{df}{dt}=f'\left(x\right) = 6x\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]\int^{\xi}_{0}6x\frac{dx}{dt}dx[/tex] = ??

or am I waaay confused?
Your second statement is incorrect. It should be
[tex]\int^{t_i}_0 6x \frac{dx}{dt}dt= \int^{x_i}_0 6x dx= 3x_i^2[/itex]<br /> Where [itex]x_i= x(t_i)[/itex][/tex]
 
  • #15
right... this is why i was so confused. i thought my prof was saying to differentiate wrt t, then integrate wrt x, not t.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K