Help with Poisson Brackets (original paper)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the translation of Poisson's original paper regarding Poisson brackets, specifically addressing the function a=f(q,u,t) and its lack of second-order derivatives in the context of constants of motion. The user questions the absence of second-order derivatives for canonical variables q, u, or p when a is a first integral of motion. A citation from Wolfram indicates that a first integral associated with time t exists only if f is independent of t and lacks second or higher derivatives of the coordinates. This establishes that a first integral cannot possess second-order derivatives of canonical variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poisson brackets in classical mechanics
  • Familiarity with constants of motion and their mathematical implications
  • Knowledge of first integrals in dynamical systems
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Poisson brackets in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Study the role of first integrals in the context of dynamical systems
  • Examine the mathematical properties of constants of motion
  • Learn about the relationship between derivatives and integrals in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, Hamiltonian dynamics, and mathematical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

gibsonphysics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Here I have a translation from French to English of the original paper by Poisson about his brackets. I cannot understand why the function a=f(q,u,t) doesn't have a second order derivative (in q or u). The problem is on the top of the third page (second .JPG) after he took the time derivative. Can somebody help me?
 

Attachments

  • Poisson_1.JPG
    Poisson_1.JPG
    50.3 KB · Views: 454
  • Poisson_2.JPG
    Poisson_2.JPG
    56.3 KB · Views: 531
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, a=f(q,u,t) is a constant of motion. Is there any restriction about second order derivatives for q or u or (p) for a constant of motion?
 
Here is a quotation that I found on Wolfram website:

"A first integral associated with the independent variable t exist if f is independent of t and does not contain any second or higher derivatives of the coordinates."

Since we have a=f(q,u,t) as a firt integral, it will not have a second derivative of any canonical variables.

What I can't understand and ;also, I didn't find anywhere is why a first integral of the motion can't have a second order derivative.

Does anybody know?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
990
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K