Help with Projectiles: Calculating Marble Flight Path

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectiles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a lab project involving the calculation of a marble's flight path after being launched from a ramp. Participants explore the physics of projectile motion, including the independence of horizontal and vertical motions, the calculation of initial velocities, and the effects of energy conservation on the marble's trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a lab setup involving a V-shaped ramp and a marble, seeking to determine the marble's flight path for a ring placement.
  • Another participant confirms the independence of horizontal and vertical motions, explaining how to calculate distances based on given vertical or horizontal distances.
  • A participant questions how to accurately determine the horizontal velocity of the marble, suggesting test runs may not yield precise results.
  • One participant introduces the conservation of energy principle to calculate the horizontal velocity, relating potential energy lost to kinetic energy gained, while noting that friction and rotational inertia may affect the results.
  • A later reply expresses confusion about the implications of energy conservation on the horizontal component of velocity.
  • Another participant shares their experience with the lab, mentioning issues with the placement of the ring affecting their results, but noting that their calculations were generally accurate.
  • A participant challenges the assumption about the rotational kinetic energy's impact, suggesting it could significantly reduce the marble's speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of projectile motion and energy conservation, but there are differing views on the impact of rotational kinetic energy and the accuracy of test runs for determining horizontal velocity. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent of these effects.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about energy loss due to friction and rotational inertia, as well as the accuracy of empirical measurements from test runs.

Gale
Messages
683
Reaction score
1
Ok so i need a tinsy bit of help with a lab. It isn't technically hw, so i didn't post in the homework help, plus its not really like a problem per se either.

So what we need to do was create a device that would make a projectile. We just made a ramp shaped like a V and a marble that slides down it and shoots off. The ramp levels off so there's no Y component to the velocity. Its a nice device, reproducable results and all that. What we need to do is know the marbles flight path so that our teacher can set up a ring at any length along its path, and we'll calulate the height so that the marble will fly through. The ring will be level with the ground.

here's the part i need a little help with, or i want to double check that what I'm doing is right. We'll do some test runs and use the times and distances it produces to find the X velocity initial of the marble. We alreasy know that the Y velocity initial is zero right? Y acceleration is 32 ft/s2 yes? no acceleration in the X direction once it leaves the ramp yes?

So once we have velocity in the X we'll have all the info we need right? Then when he gives us the distance we need to go, we'll find how long it takes the marble to travel that distance, and use it in the equation to find how far in the Y direction it goes,(the height we'll need to place the ring.)

am i wrong with anything? something I'm missing? will everything be alright and accurate and ok?

thanks yall, the help is much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that the horizontal and vertical motions are independent. Gravity affects only the vertical motion.

Your teacher is presumably going to give you either a horizontal or a vertical distance, and have you calculate the other.

If your teacher says "the ring should a vertical distance y below the end of the ramp:" First calculate the time it will take for the projectile to fall that distance, considering that the original vertical speed is zero, and the vertical acceleration is g. The horizontal velocity is constant during the time the projectile is falling, so you can caclulate exactly how far it'll fall horizontally during the time it takes to fall a distance y vertically.

If your teacher says "the ring should be a horizontal distance x from the end of the ramp:" First calculate the time it will take for the projectile to travel that horizontal distance, assuming a constant horizontal velocity at all times. Then figure out how far the projectile will fall vertically in that time, considering the original vertical velocity is zero, and the vertical acceleration is g.

Does this make sense?

- Warren
 
yeah warren, that all sounds ok. But how do i get the horizontal velocity? test runs like i said? those won't be exactly accurate. Is there another way to calculate V initial in the horizontal direction?
 
Last edited:
The conservation of energy. The mass loses some potential energy as it falls, and gains the same amount of kinetic energy. You might say that, in falling, the mass trades potential for kinetic energy.

The potential energy lost is (m g y). The kinetic energy of a mass moving at velocity v is (1/2 m v2). Since the amount of poential energy lost equals the amount of kinetic energy gained,

m g y = 1/2 m v2

Solve for v:

v = sqrt(2 g y)

The velocity of the projectile at the bottom of the ramp has nothing to do with its mass, or the shape of the ramp -- all that matters is the total vertical distance the mass descends.

Since you're rolling a marble down a ramp, I should tell you that not all of the potential energy lost goes into kinetic energy. A bit of it is lost to friction. A bit more ends up being stored in the rotational inertia of the rolling ball. (Simple analogy: a spinning fan blade has rotational inertia, and can hurt you if you touch it -- energy is "stored" in the rotation.) By and large, however, these two effects (friction and rotational inertia) are negligible.

- Warren
 
alright i have no idea what that stuff means. But all that will give me the horizontal component of the velocity when the marble leaves the ramp??
 
hmm well... we did it by test runs. it was accurate enough. The ring we had to get out ball through was barely bigger than our ball so we had to be pretty exact. And our math and physics (which i was in charge of) was right on. We didn't get it through the ring though... What happened was that the when they placed the ring the legnth away i said and the height i said, they didn't put it on the line that the ball taveled on... so it bounced off the side of the ring. It wasn't so bad though, our grade won't be terribly hurt, but now we'll know to be more careful next time. This was our first lab.

Now i have to write up a lab report and its supposed to be like with html code and on the computer and all that... stuff I'm not exactly expert with...
 
Are you sure about this? I calculated that the rotational kinetic energy would encompass about 29% of the total kinetic energy (effectively slowing the marble down quite a bit).

whoops! sorry turin!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
976
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K