Help with provinga simple algebraic equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cshum00
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving relationships between algebraic equations involving variables and constants. The subject area includes algebraic manipulation and the properties of equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss attempts to manipulate equations through addition, division, and substitution. Questions arise regarding the validity of certain transformations and the implications of specific equations. There is also a focus on clarifying the original problem statement and the correct form of the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the equations and their relationships, but no consensus has been reached on the validity of the original proof attempt.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in the formulation of equations and the need for clarity in the problem statement. There is mention of specific cases where variables equal zero, which may affect the validity of the equations being discussed.

cshum00
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[itex]ar_1 = b <=> r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]cr_d = c <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)
[itex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + c <=> r_1 + r_2 = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (add equation1 and equation2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to make the equation on the left equals to the equation on the right side. I have tried adding, subtracting and dividing values, also multiplying and dividing conjugates but nothing works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not understand something with the second equation.

Should it be

[itex] cr_2 = d <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex]
?

What do you need to prove? What is the original text of the task?
 
I have 2 equations.
[itex]ar_1 = b[/itex] (equation1)
and [itex]cr_d = c[/itex] (equation2)

i just divided by 'a' in both sides in equation1
and divided by 'c' in both sides in equation2
so i get
[itex]r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)

but they are both reversible so
[itex]ar_1 = b <=> r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]cr_d = c <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)

if i add both equations i get:
[itex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + c <=> r_1 + r_2 = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{d}{c}[/itex]
since both of the equations are the same, so should the sum be
and that is what i am trying to prove.

Any numerical examples i try, both expressions seem to be the same except for 'a' and 'c' equals to zero.
 
cshum00 said:

Homework Statement


[itex]ar_1 = b <=> r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]cr_d = c <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)
[itex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + c <=> r_1 + r_2 = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (add equation1 and equation2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to make the equation on the left equals to the equation on the right side. I have tried adding, subtracting and dividing values, also multiplying and dividing conjugates but nothing works.
You can't prove it, it isn't true. Knowing that [itex]ar_1+ br_2= b+ c[/itex] does NOT tell you that [itex]ar_1= b[/itex] and [itex]ar_2= c[/itex] separately.

Knowing the two things [itex]ar_1= b[/itex] and [itex]cr_d= c[/itex] tells you, by adding the equations, that [itex]ar_1+ cr_d= b+ c[/itex] but knowing that single fact, that [itex]ar_1+ cr_d= b+ c[/itex] does NOT tell you the two things.

For example, If x= 3 and y= 2 then x+ y= 5. But knowing only that x+y= 5 does NOT tell you that x= 3 and y= 2.
 
Then what about this case?

The parametric equation of a ellipse is:
[itex]x = acos \theta[/itex]
[itex]y = bsin \theta[/itex]

I first square both equations so I get:
[itex]x^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta[/itex] (1)
[itex]y^2 = b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (2)

Then for equation (1) divide by a^2 and equation (2) divide by b^2:
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} = cos^2 \theta[/itex] (3)
[itex]\frac{y^2}{b^2} = sin^2 \theta[/itex] (4)

So if i were to add equations (1) and (2) i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (5)
And adding equation (3) and (4)
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex] (6)

Then putting them in my format i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta <=>[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex]

Which both are equations of the ellipse the only difference is that one I can remove
the third variable of [itex]\theta[/itex] by using the trigonometry identity of [itex]sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta=1[/itex].
 
cshum00 said:
Then what about this case?

The parametric equation of a ellipse is:
[itex]x = acos \theta[/itex]
[itex]y = bsin \theta[/itex]

I first square both equations so I get:
[itex]x^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta[/itex] (1)
[itex]y^2 = b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (2)

Then for equation (1) divide by a^2 and equation (2) divide by b^2:
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} = cos^2 \theta[/itex] (3)
[itex]\frac{y^2}{b^2} = sin^2 \theta[/itex] (4)

So if i were to add equations (1) and (2) i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (5)
And adding equation (3) and (4)
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex] (6)

Then putting them in my format i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta <=>[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex]

Which both are equations of the ellipse the only difference is that one I can remove
the third variable of [itex]\theta[/itex] by using the trigonometry identity of [itex]sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta=1[/itex].
It's fairly simple to go from the parametric equations for an ellipse
[itex]x = acos \theta[/itex]
[itex]y = bsin \theta[/itex]

to the Cartesian form:
[tex]x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1[/tex]
You almost got to this form using way too many steps.

Your original equations were garbled and, I believe, confused several people responding. As far as I can tell, your equations should have been:
[tex]ar_1 = b[/tex]
[tex]cr_2 = d[/tex]
[tex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + d[/tex]
(For your second equation you had [itex]cr_d = c[/itex] which I'm nearly certain is an error. Even though Дьявол asked you whether this was an oversight, you didn't respond to him and persisted with the erroneous equation.)
Your 3rd equation essentially says that b + d = b + d, which is trivially true. There is no way to divide the first term in the third equation by a and the second term by c. IOW, you can't transform your third equation to [itex]r_1 + r_2 = <whatever>[/itex]
 
Ya the second line was an error. I should have been [itex]cr_2 = d <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex].

Sorry Дьявол. I did not notice that. And because i didn't notice, i was confused by his question of what needed to be proven; also copied the equations wrong for the second time.

Ya, the ellipse it just an simple example. I tried to write it in general form at the beginning. So going back to the general examples, if you actually try to plug some numbers you see that in the third equation both sides are the same except for "a" and "c" = 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K