Help with rotational kinetic energy, interia, etc. problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the final linear velocity of a disc and hoop rolling down a ramp using conservation of energy principles. The key equation derived is mgh = 0.5mv² + 0.5Iω², where I represents the moment of inertia. Participants clarify that both linear and rotational kinetic energy must be considered, and they emphasize the importance of the moment of inertia values for different shapes: I for a disc is MR², while for a hoop it is 1/2MR². The conversation concludes with suggestions to analyze the problem using kinematic equations and net forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with linear and rotational kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia for different geometric shapes
  • Basic grasp of kinematic equations and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem and its applications in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about the derivation and implications of moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Explore kinematic equations in the context of rotational motion
  • Investigate the relationship between torque, angular acceleration, and linear acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rolling objects.

fhwing12
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a physics lab we need to calculate the final linear velocity of a disc and hoop. The only thing we are given is the length and height of the ramp and the mass and radius of the disc and hoop.

Homework Equations



I thought before that with conservation of energy, I could just set gPE = KE + KErot.

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems like all of the radius's and mass's cancel out. I had mgh = .5mv^2 + .5kmr^2(w^2) where w is omega. I then substituted in (v/r) for w and and canceled out the m's from all of the terms and ended up with gh = .5v^2 + .5kv^2. This doesn't prove to be at all helpful though because I'm nearly positive that not every disc, regardless of its mass and radius, is going to have the same final velocity. Is there some other way I can solve this problem using the work-energy theorem or something with forces? I was thinking that W = change in KE = Fx but does the KE include both linear and rotational KE? Sorry for all of the information, but thanks to anyone that responds!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fhwing12 said:
This doesn't prove to be at all helpful though because I'm nearly positive that not every disc, regardless of its mass and radius, is going to have the same final velocity.
What makes you so sure of this?

Is there some other way I can solve this problem using the work-energy theorem or something with forces? I was thinking that W = change in KE = Fx but does the KE include both linear and rotational KE? Sorry for all of the information, but thanks to anyone that responds!
Yes, KE includes linear and rotational energy. Work is actually the dot product of force times displacement, or in other words, the force times the displacement times the cosine of the angle between them.

You could probably also analyze the problem by using kinematic equations--i.e., calculate the net force and net torque, then angular acceleration and linear acceleration and use the standard equations like v = at + v_0.
 
I'm just throwing suggestions out there (mind you I'm still in high school, but we just got finished with these concepts in my AP Physics class).

Are you completely sure that the I(moment of inertias) are the same for the disc and the hoop? If my memory doesn't fail me, I believe the I for a disc is MR^2 where as for the hoop it is 1/2MR^2.

Depending on whether I completely misunderstood what exactly you are doing in the lab, that could either be helpful or completely useless.

I hope it helps! Good luck!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K