Help with simplifying a 2nd order pde

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a second-order partial differential equation (PDE) of the form dp/ds = 4 + (1/e)(d/de)(e*dp/de), with the variables p, s, and e being dimensionless. Participants are exploring the implications of assuming a separable solution and the subsequent simplification of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to manipulate the equation by equating the right-hand side to zero and converting partial derivatives to total derivatives. There is a discussion about the validity of this approach and the implications of the constant term '4' in the context of a separable solution.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the initial assumption of setting the right-hand side to zero, suggesting that this may not hold for non-trivial solutions. Others are providing guidance on how to rewrite the equation to clarify the separation of variables and how to handle the constant term.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the solution is separable and are using the finite difference method for further analysis. There is an ongoing exploration of how to properly apply the method of separation of variables in the context of the given PDE.

lohanlotter
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was given the equation
dp/ds = 4 + 1/e*d/de(e*dp/de)

The derivatives in the equation are partial derivatives

the values of p,s,e are dimensionless numbers.

I am to assume that the solution is separable and then use finite difference method to solve for p, the finite difference method is not a problem. This is where i am having problems. What will the equation be after the assumption is made and the equation is simplified.

I have attempted the question:

I equated the right hand side = 0:

4 + 1/e*d/de(e*dp/de) = 0

and made the partial derivatives total derivatives and then applied the chain rule:

4 + 1/e*dp/de + d/de(dp/de). Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lohanlotter said:
I was given the equation
dp/ds = 4 + 1/e*d/de(e*dp/de)

The derivatives in the equation are partial derivatives

the values of p,s,e are dimensionless numbers.

I am to assume that the solution is separable and then use finite difference method to solve for p, the finite difference method is not a problem. This is where i am having problems. What will the equation be after the assumption is made and the equation is simplified.

I have attempted the question:

I equated the right hand side = 0:

4 + 1/e*d/de(e*dp/de) = 0

and made the partial derivatives total derivatives and then applied the chain rule:

4 + 1/e*dp/de + d/de(dp/de). Is this correct?
I'm not sure why you have set the right hand side to zero. If you have a separable solution, this will not be the case for non-trivial solutions. The method of separation of variables should be applied as follows.

Let p(e,s) = q(e)r(s). Then we have

\frac{\partial}{\partial s}q(e)r(s) = 4 + \frac{1}{e}\frac{\partial}{\partial e}\left(e\frac{\partial}{\partial e} q(e)r(s)\right)\;.

Can you take it from here?
 
I have attempted it again:

using the equation given i ended up with:

q*dr/ds = 4 + r(1/e*dq/de+d/de(dq/de))

what happens to the 4 then??
 
lohanlotter said:
I have attempted it again:

using the equation given i ended up with:

q*dr/ds = 4 + r(1/e*dq/de+d/de(dq/de))

what happens to the 4 then??
Let's re-write it so that we can see what's happening more clearly:

q(e)r^\prime(s) = 4 + r(s)\left[\frac{q^\prime(e)}{e} + q^{\prime\prime}(e)\right]

This is still a separable equation, the fact that you have an additional constant term doesn't matter. If you're struggling to see it, let R(s) = 4+r(s). Then R^\prime(s) = r^\prime(s) leading to

q(e)R^\prime(s) = R(s)\left[\frac{q^\prime(e)}{e} + q^{\prime\prime}(e)\right]

Can you now continue?
 
Yes thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K