I Help with the Virial Theorem please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the kinetic energy of a star cluster composed of stars and gas, with specific masses and density distributions. The total mass of the gas is expressed as a fraction of the total mass of the stars. The relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) is established as 2KE + PE = 0, with formulas provided for both KE and PE. Participants emphasize the need for clearer mathematical notation to facilitate understanding of the equations involved. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying the virial theorem in astrophysical contexts.
Alfie114
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I have a question about the virial theorem as applied to a cluster of stars.
Anyone able to help if I provide you with more details?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
:welcome:

You might need to provide a bit more detail about your question.
 
OK we have a star cluster (the system) which is made up from stars (total mass M sub *) and gas (total mass M sub g). The stars and gas are all distributed as spheres of constant density and a finite radius r sub c.

The total mass of the stars and the gas is different but we can assume that M sub g = f*M sub *

If the system is unrotating and in equilibrium how do we calculate the kinetic energy in terms of r sub c, f and M sub *?

We can take 2KE + PE = 0 where KE = (-3/5) (GM^2/R) and PE = (3kT/2)*n where n is the total number of particles = (M/mu*m sub H) where mu=1 and m sub H is the mass of a hydrogen atom.
 
Alfie114 said:
OK we have a star cluster (the system) which is made up from stars (total mass M sub *) and gas (total mass M sub g). The stars and gas are all distributed as spheres of constant density and a finite radius r sub c.

The total mass of the stars and the gas is different but we can assume that M sub g = f*M sub *

If the system is unrotating and in equilibrium how do we calculate the kinetic energy in terms of r sub c, f and M sub *?

We can take 2KE + PE = 0 where KE = (-3/5) (GM^2/R) and PE = (3kT/2)*n where n is the total number of particles = (M/mu*m sub H) where mu=1 and m sub H is the mass of a hydrogen atom.
You need to use math latex notation. Its hard to understand your equations like this.
 
Ok I've got these where omega is the potential energy
1575636887584.png
1575636809181.png
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top