Help with thermodynamics question please

  • Thread starter Thread starter pureouchies4717
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving the kinetic energy of an oxygen molecule and its relationship to gravitational potential energy. The original poster seeks to determine the height from which an oxygen molecule must fall in a vacuum for its kinetic energy to equal the average energy of the molecule at a specified temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines their understanding of average energy and kinetic energy formulas but expresses uncertainty about determining the height. Some participants suggest using conservation of energy principles and question the setup of the energy equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with one providing a potential equation setup for the energy balance. There is a confirmation of the approach, but no consensus on the complete solution or further steps has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to gravitational effects and the specific conditions of a vacuum, which may influence the assumptions made in the problem setup.

pureouchies4717
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
this is the question:

From what height must an oxygen molecule fall in a vacuum so that its kinetic energy at the bottom equals the average energy of an oxygen molecule at 300 K?

i know how to find the average energy:

average energy= (3/2)K(b)T
= 6.21 x 10^-21

i also know how to find the kinetic energy of an oxygen molecule:

K= 1/2 m v(rms)^2

the only problem is that i don't know how to get the distance. can someone please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use conservation of total energy and keep in mind that gravity is the force that is responsible for making the molecule fall down.

regards
marlon
 
thanks!

so then:

6.21 x 10^-21 = mgh

is that the right setup?
 
Last edited:
nick727kcin said:
thanks!

so then:

6.21 x 10^-21 = mgh

is that the right setup?

yes

marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K