Hermite Interpolation extended to second derivative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a homework problem involving Hermite Interpolation, specifically finding a polynomial of least degree that satisfies the conditions p(1)=-1, p'(1)=2, p''(1)=0, p(2)=1, and p'(2)=-2. The solution utilizes Newton's Form for the Hermite Interpolant, leading to the final polynomial expression: -1 + 2(x-1) - 4(x-1)³(x-2). The participant initially struggled with the second derivative condition but ultimately confirmed the correct approach through Newton's formalism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermite Polynomials
  • Familiarity with Newton's Form for Hermite Interpolants
  • Knowledge of polynomial derivatives
  • Basic calculus concepts related to interpolation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Hermite Polynomials
  • Learn about Newton's Form for polynomial interpolation
  • Explore advanced topics in numerical analysis related to interpolation methods
  • Practice solving problems involving polynomial derivatives and interpolation
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics or engineering fields, particularly those studying numerical methods, interpolation techniques, or polynomial calculus.

Haydo
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
SOLVED

1. Homework Statement

Find polynomial of least degree satisfying:
p(1)=-1, p'(1)=2, p''(1)=0, p(2)=1, p'(2)=-2

Homework Equations


In general, a Hermite Polynomial is defined by the following:
∑[f(xi)*hi(x)+f'(xi)*h2i(x)]
where:
hi(xj)=1 if i=j and 0 otherwise. Similarly with h'2. h'i(x)=0 and h2(x)=0. i.e., they are zero if they are integrated or derived.

Here is a page from wolfram with general information: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HermitesInterpolatingPolynomial.html

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I recognized x0=1 and x1=2. I tried to create some third coefficient term in order to satisfy p''(1)=0, but that seems to mean that I would have to make hi(xj) be zero for the second derivative, and I have no idea how to do this. I tried just setting this new h (call it h3) equal to (x)(x-2) when derived twice and integrating (so that h3''=1 for x1 and zero otherwise) but that was a total flop.

I'm starting to think that, despite the question's section (it was in the section regarding Hermite Interpolating Polynomials), there is a better way to approach it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For anyone reading this, I believe I have to use Newton's Formalism for the Hermite Interpolating polynomial, instead of Lagrange's.

EDIT- Yep, this is how to solve it. Answer is:
-1+2(x-1)-4(x-1)^3(x-2)

Here is a page describing Newton's Form for the Hermite Interpolant
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K