Solving Hess's Law Problem for ΔH of Formation of Hematite

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the enthalpy of formation (ΔH) for hematite (Fe2O3) at 1200K using Hess's Law. The user integrated the constant pressure heat capacity (C_p) function of hematite over the temperature range from 298K to 1200K and added the heats of transformation, resulting in a value of 129300J/mol. However, it was clarified that the ΔH of formation at 298K, which is -821300J/mol, should not be added to this value, as the enthalpy of formation is defined as the enthalpy change when the compound is formed from its elements at standard states. The user needs to focus on the enthalpy change for heating hematite rather than combining these two values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hess's Law
  • Knowledge of constant pressure heat capacity (C_p) functions
  • Familiarity with enthalpy of formation concepts
  • Basic thermodynamics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Hess's Law in thermodynamic calculations
  • Study the integration of heat capacity functions over temperature ranges
  • Learn about the standard enthalpy of formation and its significance
  • Explore the differences between absolute and relative enthalpy values
USEFUL FOR

Students in thermodynamics courses, chemists, and anyone involved in calculating thermodynamic properties of compounds, particularly those studying the formation of minerals like hematite.

ice87
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So I'm taking Thermodynamics I in university. I'm just doing the homework now, and there is something that i don't really understand.

To get the Enthalpy of formation for hematite (Fe2O3) at 1200K, I first integrated the constant pressure heat capacity function over the temperature range from 298K to 1200K, then added the heats of transformation across this temperature range. but now, at the end, should the enthalpy of formation at 298K be added to the number that i found?

=> integrating over from 298K to 1200K, and adding the heat of transformation for hematite: I got this number: 129300J/mol

=> ΔH of formation at 298K is given as -821300J/mol, should i add these two numbers together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You integrated the heat capacities of what from 298 - 1200? Hess's Law.
 
roughly speaking I integrated the C_p function of Fe2O3 - hematite from 298 to 1200.
I really integrated it three times, because hematite has 3 states in this temperature range, and the C_p function for each state is different.
 
Okay, that gives you the difference in enthalpy between hematite at 298 and 1200, right? Says nothing about absolute or standard enthalpy of formation of hematite at either temperature. Enthalpy of formation is defined as the enthalpy change when the compound is formed from the elements at their standard states at the same temperature. You are looking for the enthalpy of formation of hematite at 1200 K, the enthalpy change you would observe if you combined oxygen and iron to form hematite at 1200 K. What you have is the enthalpy change for heating hematite from 298 to 1200 and the enthalpy of formation of hematite at 298. Read the section on Hess's Law again.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
27K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K