HHV experiment with bomb calorimeter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the determination of the Higher Heating Value (HHV) of biodiesel fuel using a bomb calorimeter. It concludes that if the bomb calorimeter is not perfectly insulated, heat loss to the surroundings results in a lower calculated HHV due to the need for additional energy input to compensate for this loss. The participants emphasize the importance of heat transfer dynamics and the role of initial temperature settings in HHV calculations, noting that a higher initial temperature can lead to an increased HHV reading. The conversation also highlights the significance of adhering to ASTM specifications for accurate HHV calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bomb calorimetry principles
  • Familiarity with Higher Heating Value (HHV) calculations
  • Knowledge of heat transfer concepts
  • Awareness of ASTM specifications related to calorimetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Review ASTM D240 for biodiesel HHV determination standards
  • Study the impact of insulation on calorimetry results
  • Examine the equations used for calculating HHV in bomb calorimetry
  • Research advanced calorimetry techniques, including adiabatic calorimetry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for chemists, laboratory technicians, and researchers involved in biofuel analysis, as well as educators teaching calorimetry and thermodynamics principles.

Will
This question refers to a lab that we did for determining the HHV value of bio diesel fuel. We are asked if the experiment was done using a higher initial temperature than the bomb was calibrated for, how would this affect the HHV determined? The room temperature is assumed to be the same in both cases. Our logic says that if the bomb is not 100% insulated, then more heat would be lost to the surroundings, and thus a lower value for HHV would result. Is this correct? Looking at some results online, it seems that a higher value was found with higher initial temperatures. So I need some input from the experts here; it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it this way...you are looking at how much energy has to go into the fuel to find it's HHV. If the bomb is not insulted, you will lose energy to the surroundings which means that it will appear that you have to add more to the fuel to overcome that loss. As an example, let's say it takes 10 units of energy in a perfectly insulated machine. Now, there is a slight loss of 2 units to the atmosphere. You now have to provide 12 units of energy to get the same result. So, with the imperfections, it would tend to show an increase in HHV.
 
FredGarvin said:
So, with the imperfections, it would tend to show an increase in HHV.
Why higher? Wouldn't more heat lost to the system mean less change in temperature in the bomb, thus a lower calculated HHV? Also how does this relate to changing the initial temperature of the bomb?
 
You do not want the bomb to be insulated. It's the fact that heat transfers from the bomb to the surrounding water that gives you the temperature rise to calculate the HHV. You do not want any heat transfer from the bucket to the surroundings. In fact, the more precise machines will have a water jacket around the bucket with heated water to try to match the rate of temperature rise of the water in the bucket in an attempt to make the entire bucket adiabatic.

I am trying to remember the whole process of doing this. We should look at the equations you use to calculate the HHV. I haven't read the ASTM spec on this in quite a while. Let me do some research back into the calcs before we go any further.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K