Higgs Field/Particle: Evidence for Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter _PJ_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Higgs field and particle, particularly focusing on the evidence supporting the theory and the implications of the Higgs field in physics. Participants explore theoretical aspects, experimental evidence, and the complexities of the Higgs mechanism.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about the Higgs field, describing it as "contrived" and questioning the existence of experimental evidence that is not retrospective.
  • Another participant asserts that the Higgs field is the simplest known method to break electroweak symmetry, while acknowledging the existence of more complex alternatives.
  • A participant challenges the correctness of the initial skepticism, asking for clarification on what was deemed incorrect.
  • One participant claims that the Higgs field does not limit gravity.
  • Another participant defends the Higgs field as a valid explanation for spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, which they argue is crucial for understanding the universe's origins and the formation of particles during primordial nucleosynthesis.
  • Discussion includes references to the LHC's data collection, noting that it has observed the expected number of Higgs bosons relative to the data collected.
  • There is mention of the LHC not currently producing a Higgs boson, with a participant suggesting to monitor data trends for future developments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and implications of the Higgs field theory, with no consensus reached on the correctness of claims made. Disagreement exists regarding the interpretation of experimental data and the theoretical framework surrounding the Higgs mechanism.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the complexity of alternative theories to the Higgs field and the limitations of current experimental data from the LHC, indicating ongoing uncertainty in the discussion.

_PJ_
Messages
229
Reaction score
15
I must admit, whilst I can accept the physics of the "energy well" for a Higgs field, and its implications for limiting light and gravity etc. but overall, I find it rather too 'contrived'.

Are there any actual experimental results or evidence to support the theory that aren't typically "retrospective"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost every word in this post is incorrect, but let me say that the Higgs field is the simplest way known to break electroweak symmetry. Alternatives exist, but they are considerably more complex.
 
Bill_K said:
Almost every word in this post is incorrect,.
I'll assume you refer to my post, rather than your own?
What do you mean by an incorrect word?
 
doesnt limit gravity
 
The Higgs Field is a great way to explain spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking which affects almost everything pertaining to the Universe and its origins. As far as I know, there is no other quantum physical way to explain the creation of the inhomogeneities that eventually expanded into the particles of primordial nucleosynthesis.
 
Yes, and the LHC has collected 0.05% of the data and half the energy. It sees exactly the same number of Higgses as expected.
 
Yes.LHC firing on all cylinders, but no Higgs boson yet:cry:
 
No, not firing on all cylinders. Reread my post.
 
Keep an eye on this plot. If nothing happens by the time the vertical axis gets up to 1000 or so, you can start using the crying emoticon. (It's currently around 26 -- more than half of last year's total data in about the space of a week!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K