High energy electron positron branching ratios.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the branching ratios of high-energy electron-positron annihilation processes, specifically the ratios of cross-sections for the reactions σ(e- + e+ → μ- + μ+) and σ(e- + e+ → τ- + τ+). At high energies, these ratios tend to unity due to the negligible mass difference between muons and taus compared to the photon energy. However, the ratio σ(e- + e+ → μ- + μ+) to σ(e- + e+ → e- + e+) does not approach unity, as the latter process involves additional scattering channels that reduce the effective cross-section.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics, specifically electron-positron annihilation.
  • Familiarity with Feynman diagrams and matrix elements in quantum field theory.
  • Knowledge of cross-section calculations and their significance in particle interactions.
  • Basic grasp of resonance phenomena in particle production.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and its application to electron-positron interactions.
  • Explore the concept of resonance in particle physics and its effects on cross-sections.
  • Investigate the differences between annihilation and scattering processes in high-energy physics.
  • Learn about the role of virtual particles in quantum field theory and their impact on observable cross-sections.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying quantum field theory, and researchers analyzing electron-positron collision data will benefit from this discussion.

SteDolan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

Why does the ratio:

\frac{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow μ^- + μ^+) }{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow τ^- + τ^+)}

tend to unity at high energies and would you expect the same for:

\frac{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow μ^- + μ^+) }{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow e^- + e^+)}

The attempt at a solution

So I have a good idea of the first part:

An electron positron annihilation is going to lead to a photon. If the photon's energy is large compared to twice the rest mass of a tau then both channels are available and, if the mass difference between a muon and tau is small on the scale of the photon energy, approximately the same as far as the photon is concerned.

Now for the second part. As far as I can tell my argument applies just as well to say that the second ratio should also tend to unity but the way the question is phrased implies it doesn't :-p.

I guess this means something is wrong with my approach to justifying the first ratio tending to unity?

Thanks in advance for any help :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SteDolan said:
An electron positron annihilation is going to lead to a photon. If the photon's energy is large compared to twice the rest mass of a tau then both channels are available and, if the mass difference between a muon and tau is small on the scale of the photon energy, approximately the same as far as the photon is concerned.
Correct.

Now for the second part. As far as I can tell my argument applies just as well to say that the second ratio should also tend to unity but the way the question is phrased implies it doesn't :-p.
Your argument is valid only for the specific process you considered...
Your feeling is right, the ratio does not go to 1.
 
Thanks for the reply.

But as soon as you've got the free photon I don't understand why it would favor (or disfavor) an electron positron pair rather than a muon or tau pair.

The argument would just be if the energy is much greater than twice the muon rest mass the muon and electron are the same as far as the photon is concerned.

The only thing I can think of is that, since the photon is created by an electron positron pair, is it at a sort of resonance energy for electron positron production? This would obviously favor electron pair production.
 
SteDolan said:
But as soon as you've got the free photon I don't understand why it would favor (or disfavor) an electron positron pair rather than a muon or tau pair.
It does not, but getting a single (virtual) photon is not the only process.
There are other processes for ee->ee only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for the hint! I think I understand:

The ee -> ee interaction has a scattering channel as well as the annihilation channel. By the Feynman rules these matrix elements should be subtracted leading to a reduced ee -> ee cross section.
 
Reduced?
Are you sure?

Especially for low momentum transfers, the cross-section is large.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K