High energy electron positron branching ratios.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the branching ratios of electron-positron annihilation processes, specifically comparing the cross sections for producing muon pairs and tau pairs, as well as electron pairs. Participants explore why certain ratios tend to unity at high energies and question the implications of the phrasing of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the reasoning behind the ratios of cross sections, considering the energy of the photon produced in electron-positron annihilation and its implications for particle production. Questions arise about the validity of applying similar arguments to different processes and the influence of resonance energy on pair production.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts involved, with some participants providing hints and clarifications. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of the processes and the ratios, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the phrasing of the question may imply certain assumptions about the behavior of the ratios at high energies, leading to confusion about the applicability of their reasoning across different scenarios.

SteDolan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

Why does the ratio:

\frac{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow μ^- + μ^+) }{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow τ^- + τ^+)}

tend to unity at high energies and would you expect the same for:

\frac{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow μ^- + μ^+) }{σ(e^- + e^+ \rightarrow e^- + e^+)}

The attempt at a solution

So I have a good idea of the first part:

An electron positron annihilation is going to lead to a photon. If the photon's energy is large compared to twice the rest mass of a tau then both channels are available and, if the mass difference between a muon and tau is small on the scale of the photon energy, approximately the same as far as the photon is concerned.

Now for the second part. As far as I can tell my argument applies just as well to say that the second ratio should also tend to unity but the way the question is phrased implies it doesn't :-p.

I guess this means something is wrong with my approach to justifying the first ratio tending to unity?

Thanks in advance for any help :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SteDolan said:
An electron positron annihilation is going to lead to a photon. If the photon's energy is large compared to twice the rest mass of a tau then both channels are available and, if the mass difference between a muon and tau is small on the scale of the photon energy, approximately the same as far as the photon is concerned.
Correct.

Now for the second part. As far as I can tell my argument applies just as well to say that the second ratio should also tend to unity but the way the question is phrased implies it doesn't :-p.
Your argument is valid only for the specific process you considered...
Your feeling is right, the ratio does not go to 1.
 
Thanks for the reply.

But as soon as you've got the free photon I don't understand why it would favor (or disfavor) an electron positron pair rather than a muon or tau pair.

The argument would just be if the energy is much greater than twice the muon rest mass the muon and electron are the same as far as the photon is concerned.

The only thing I can think of is that, since the photon is created by an electron positron pair, is it at a sort of resonance energy for electron positron production? This would obviously favor electron pair production.
 
SteDolan said:
But as soon as you've got the free photon I don't understand why it would favor (or disfavor) an electron positron pair rather than a muon or tau pair.
It does not, but getting a single (virtual) photon is not the only process.
There are other processes for ee->ee only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for the hint! I think I understand:

The ee -> ee interaction has a scattering channel as well as the annihilation channel. By the Feynman rules these matrix elements should be subtracted leading to a reduced ee -> ee cross section.
 
Reduced?
Are you sure?

Especially for low momentum transfers, the cross-section is large.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K