Is This High School Physics Exam Question Fair?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noodlesofrome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    High school School
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a high school physics exam question concerning the forces acting on a skier moving at constant velocity. Participants are questioning the fairness of the problem due to perceived missing information regarding opposing forces such as friction and air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the implications of the skier's constant velocity and the need for additional forces to maintain that state. There is a focus on the absence of information about friction and air resistance in the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified a potential oversight in the reference materials provided for the exam, suggesting that the problem may lack sufficient context for a fair assessment. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct reference sheet and its contents.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the official reference sheet may contain relevant information about the coefficient of kinetic friction, which could be critical to solving the problem. There is uncertainty regarding the availability of this information in the materials provided to students.

noodlesofrome
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hi I am new here, but I signed up to ask this question. I was looking at a high school physics exam from last june and one of the questions seems to me like it's unfair. I think they didn't give enough information to solve the problem. here it is;

An 80-kilogram skier slides on waxed skis along a
horizontal surface of snow at constant velocity
while pushing with his poles. What is the horizontal
component of the force pushing him
forward?

(1) 0.05 N
(2) 0.4 N
(3) 40 N
(4) 4 N

The correct answer is supposedly #3, but I am really unsure why. The problem and the supplied formula tables made no mention to air resistance or friction forces that oppose his forward momentum. If the skier is already at a constant velocity and we neglect any opposing forces, we shouldn't need to apply any extra forces to keep him moving. Am I mistaken?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, the problem seems to be missing some data. Since he's pushing with his poles, friction must be acting. (I presume that no data about the coefficient of friction was given?)
 
It turns out that on the official Regents reference sheet, the coefficient of kinetic friction for a waxed ski on snow is given as 0.05.
 
wow that was fast. thanks for your reply.

If that is the case, then I did overlook that. However I looked at the reference sheet again and I don't see it. this is the link for the pdf

http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/reftable/reftablearch/physicstbl.pdf"

do you have something different?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<---- feels kinda dumb

Thanks for your replies doc. I did have the wrong reference tables. I would not have noticed until now.

here is the correct link
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/reftable/reftablearch/physics06tbl.pdf

you are awsome :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K