High school student recites 8,784 digits of pi

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the distinction between memorization and mathematical ability, sparked by a high school student's impressive feat of reciting 8,784 digits of pi. Participants question whether such a skill qualifies him as a mathematician or simply highlights exceptional memorization capabilities. While some acknowledge the achievement as remarkable, they argue it does not demonstrate true mathematical skill, as it involves recitation rather than calculation. The conversation also touches on the perceived value of memorizing digits of pi compared to more practical applications of memory, with some expressing disdain for what they consider a waste of time. Additionally, there are humorous exchanges about cultural stereotypes and the social implications of having such a skill. Overall, the thread emphasizes the difference between memorization and mathematical understanding, while also reflecting on societal attitudes toward such feats.
  • #31
Dawguard said:
Memory is extremely important, but to waste it on such meaningless information as the digits of Pi is simply, in my ever-so-humble opinion, stupid. He could do anything else with his memory and he did that! What about memorizing formulas, rules of grammer, passages from books you read, or anythign that is relevant to your life! What a waste, what a sheer waste!
Do you really think so?
Your conclusion would be based on a couple of pretty shaky assumptions (mix & match as you wish):
  • that one has only a certain amount of memory, such that some of it could be 'wasted'
  • that one has only a certain amount of free time, such that doing some pointless activity is demonstrably eating into more meaningful activities
  • that the rest of us are using our free time and/or free memory to do more meaningful things - demonstrably more than this person is (eg. what if this guy has no TV, or better yet what if he doesn't frequent the General discussion boards on forums? What if that's the time he uses to memorize pi? Is it still a stupid irrelevant waste of time? Or at least any more of a stupid, irrelevant waste of time than the rest of us are guilty of?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
DaveC426913 said:
Do you really think so?
Your conclusion would be based on a couple of pretty shaky assumptions (mix & match as you wish):
  • that one has only a certain amount of memory, such that some of it could be 'wasted'
  • that one has only a certain amount of free time, such that doing some pointless activity is demonstrably eating into more meaningful activities
  • that the rest of us are using our free time and/or free memory to do more meaningful things - demonstrably more than this person is (eg. what if this guy has no TV, or better yet what if he doesn't frequent the General discussion boards on forums? What if that's the time he uses to memorize pi? Is it still a stupid irrelevant waste of time? Or at least any more of a stupid, irrelevant waste of time than the rest of us are guilty of?)
The big waste in memorizing 8,784 digits of pi is that he's still 84,106 digits short of reaching where my birthday appears in pi.
 
  • #33
Monique said:
That's not hard, I had all the molecular weights memorized along with it o:)
Pssh. If you owned a Post 1491 or a Hemmi 257, you wouldn't have to memorize the molecular weights (at least of any of the molecules you're most likely to use).

Hemmi 257
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K