High strain rate testing using the SHPB -- Help please

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on high strain-rate testing of a glass-filled composite material using a split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiment. The user, Ben, reports discrepancies in the Young's modulus of the material, which should be around 5-6 GPa, but is yielding unexpected results. He has utilized strain gauges on maraging steel 250 pressure bars and a program for data analysis, which has previously produced accurate results for other materials. Despite varying the Young's modulus inputs between 160 GPa and 220 GPa, the output remains largely unchanged, prompting a request for insights into potential causes of the anomaly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing methodology
  • Familiarity with Young's modulus and its significance in material testing
  • Knowledge of strain gauge applications and data interpretation
  • Experience with data analysis software for experimental results
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the calibration and accuracy of strain gauges used in SHPB testing
  • Research the effects of material properties on SHPB test results
  • Explore alternative data analysis techniques for SHPB experiments
  • Review previous studies on similar composite materials tested with SHPB
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineering students, materials scientists, and researchers involved in high strain-rate testing and composite material analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Ben_P_1992
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
I am a part C mechanical engineering student and require some advice for my individual project, which is based on the high strain-rate testing of a particular glass filled composite material using a split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiment.

I gathered the results on a SHPB test rig and have external data which is being used for comparative analysis to verify my results, however the Young's modulus of the material seems to be way off (It should be about 5-6GPa!) I was hoping somebody had some experience with this experiment or had any ideas as to why this has occurred? Please see the graph below- the gradient of my results should match that of the two curves labelled Finland Test.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-31-21-png.82985/

The data used was gathered from strain gauges mounted on the maraging steel 250 pressure bars. The measured voltage and time was then manipulated with a program (this program has been used in previous experiments and outputted matching results for different materials.) The only inputs required for this program is the elastic wave speed of the pressure bars and their modulus of elasticity as well as the specimen dimensions pre-testing. I am confident that these inputs are correct, and have even played about with the inputs for both (varied the Young's modulus from 160GPa to 220GPa in 10GPa intervals) to see how the Young's modulus is affected, but there is little effect. Please see the graph below:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-37-34-png.82986/

I am very stuck and am not quite sure how to explain why this happening. Any help or advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Ben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hey Ben, sorry I'm afraid I won't be of much help as I haven't made it as far as you, but I just wanted to let you know your pictures are not coming up. Just letting you know so you can fix it so someone who can help you will be able to.
 
Thanks for the heads up. The pictures are attached here.https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-31-21-png.82985/
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-37-34-png.82986/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your images are still broken.
You say that this test setup has been successfully used before, but were those previous materials as soft as yours?
 
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi. Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K