Higher Order Non-Homogenous ODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter kape
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higher order Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the higher-order non-homogeneous ordinary differential equation (ODE) represented by the equation x^3y''' - 3x^2y'' + (6-x^2)xy' - (6-x^2)y = 0. The user is confused about the implications of the known solution y_1 = x and how to handle the term (6-x^2) within the context of the quadratic equation derived from their substitutions. They explore potential roots and initial conditions but struggle to verify their results, leading to questions about the correctness of their constants and the roots of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of higher-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of substitution in differential equations
  • Knowledge of initial value problems and their applications
  • Ability to manipulate and solve quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of reduction of order for solving ODEs
  • Learn about the application of initial conditions in solving differential equations
  • Research the characteristics of Euler-Cauchy equations and their solutions
  • Explore the implications of known solutions in the context of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to higher-order ODEs and their solutions.

kape
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Higher Order Homogenous ODE (Euler-Cauchy)

*sigh* I am (yet again) stuck on a problem.. I would greatly appreciate any help!

[tex]x^3y''' - 3x^2y'' + (6-x^2)xy' - (6-x^2)y = 0[/tex]

[tex]\inline y_1 = x[/tex] is a solution to the equation above

y'(0) = 3
y''(0) = 9
y'''(0) = 18

I'm not quite sure what it means by "[tex]\inline y_1 = x[/tex] is a solution to the equation above" so I decided to ignore it. I probably shouldn't have because it is probably something I need to know and it is probably the reason why I haven't been able to solve this problem.

-----------------------
What I have done so far

Substituting [tex]\inline m^n[/tex] for y and dividing by [tex]\inline x^m[/tex] I got:

[tex]m(m-1)(m-2) - 3m(m-1) + (6-x^2)m - (6-x^2) = 0[/tex]

[tex]m(m-1)(m-2) - 3m(m-1) + (6-x^2)(m-1) = 0[/tex]

[tex]m(m-2) - 3m + (6-x^2) = 0[/tex]

[tex]m^2 - 5m + (6-x^2) = 0[/tex]

It is at this point that I am confused. It looks like a quadratic equation but what do I do with the (6-x^2)?!?


-----------
Question 1:

What DO I do with (6-x^2) ?!


Someone told me that he got the roots 1, 2, 3... which I then tried, but got the answer wrong:

[tex]y = c_1x + c_2x^2 + c_3x^3[/tex]

[tex]y' = c + 2c_2x + 3c_3x^2[/tex]

[tex]y'' = 2c_2 + 6c_3x[/tex]

[tex]y''' = 6c_3[/tex]

And putting in the initial values I get:

[tex]c_1 = 3[/tex]

[tex]c_2 = 9/2[/tex]

[tex]c_3 = 3[/tex]

Which doesn't seem right.. (can there be two different constants that have the same value?) But I put in the found constants into the original equation to get:

[tex]y = 3x + \frac{9}{2}x^2 + 3x^3[/tex]

Which is.. wrong.


-----------
Question 2:

Are the roots not 1, 2, 3 or did I do something wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the substitution [tex]y=xu[/tex] where the x is from the known solution and u is a function of x [i.e. u=u(x)], we also have

[tex]y=xu[/tex]
[tex]y^{\prime}=xu^{\prime}+u[/tex]
[tex]y^{\prime\prime}=xu^{\prime\prime}+2u^{\prime}[/tex]
[tex]y^{\prime\prime\prime}=xu^{\prime\prime\prime}+3u^{\prime\prime}[/tex]

substitute these into the given 3rd order DE to get (after a good deal of cancelation)

[tex]x^3u^{\prime\prime\prime}-x^4u^{\prime}=0[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K