Highest useful Fahrenheit temperature?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance of Fahrenheit temperature conversions at extremely high temperatures, particularly those exceeding 1000°F. Participants argue that Fahrenheit is primarily useful for everyday contexts, such as cooking, but becomes irrelevant in scientific and industrial applications where Celsius or Kelvin is preferred. The consensus is that Fahrenheit conversions are unnecessary for temperatures above 1000°F, as most scientific communication occurs in Celsius or Kelvin. The conversation highlights the cultural persistence of Fahrenheit in the U.S. despite the global preference for metric units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of temperature scales: Celsius, Fahrenheit, and Kelvin
  • Basic knowledge of scientific communication standards
  • Familiarity with the context of temperature in cooking and industrial applications
  • Awareness of the cultural significance of measurement systems in the U.S.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of Fahrenheit and Celsius temperature scales
  • Explore the applications of Kelvin in scientific research and engineering
  • Investigate the impact of measurement systems on scientific communication
  • Learn about the adiabatic flame temperatures of various chemicals and their relevance in industry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for scientists, engineers, educators, and anyone involved in temperature-sensitive industries, as well as individuals interested in the cultural implications of measurement systems.

  • #31
anorlunda said:
I regret the hijack.
Apologies for aiding and abetting.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
anorlunda said:
The association of numbers with feelings depends of memories of past days; usually from childhood. It will be 90 today.
I will add my usual plea for the preservation of the Fahrenheit scale . It is actually defined on humanist values. We are creatures made of saline solution. We will freeze solid at 0F We will be unpleasantly hot at 100F because we optimize at 98.6F. A good temperature is 70F...it is a passing score...
There is nothing to recommend the celsius scale except ubiquity.
We represent a last bastion of Temperature Sanity on the planet.
Fahrenheit Forever.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G and Algr
  • #33
Strato Incendus said:
Degrees Celsius seemed to be the way to go initially, as it's more widely used; however, in space it does indeed make more sense to go with Kelvin, which will be equally novel for most people on board.
I'd really question this. Even on a spaceship, the majority of measurements of temperature made would be of things related to human survival, not how cold it is outside.
 
  • #34
hutchphd said:
We are creatures made of saline solution. We will freeze solid at 0F We will be unpleasantly hot at 100F because we optimize at 98.6F. A good temperature is 70F...it is a passing score...
Of all things, man is the measure. - Protagoras
 
  • #35
DaveC426913 said:
Says the guy who just said ... er ... Hookle? :oldbiggrin:
You'll need to understand what this really means. Not directly telling, but I would cut the character size to 4, and the characters number 3 and number 4 are identical consonants. Your expected human intelligence, and enough familiarity with English will help you see what "Hoockle" was meant to be. Not absolutely clear how was the seriousness of your comment.
 
  • #36
hutchphd said:
I will add my usual plea for the preservation of the Fahrenheit scale . It is actually defined on humanist values. We are creatures made of saline solution. We will freeze solid at 0F We will be unpleasantly hot at 100F because we optimize at 98.6F. A good temperature is 70F...it is a passing score...
There is nothing to recommend the celsius scale except ubiquity.
We represent a last bastion of Temperature Sanity on the planet.
Fahrenheit Forever.
Time is now to read about the development of the Fahrenheit Scale. Decide on each's own how much sense that makes. Celsius scale is based on water's freeze-melt point and boil point.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #37
symbolipoint said:
Not absolutely clear how was the seriousness of your comment.
Well, I Googled it and it didn't even show up in Urban Dictionary, so colour me stumped. (Aren't you an Ozzie or something? :wink: )
 
  • #38
symbolipoint said:
symbolipoint said:
You'll need to understand what this really means. Not directly telling, but I would cut the character size to 4, and the characters number 3 and number 4 are identical consonants. Your expected human intelligence, and enough familiarity with English will help you see what "Hoockle" was meant to be. Not absolutely clear how was the seriousness of your comment.

Decide if you are or are not in favor of effective communication.
Well I think I’ve chosen the opposite of you.
 
  • #39
Thread is locked for Mentor review...
 
  • #40
Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G and russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K