Homework EquationsThe Attempt at a SolutionDifficult 3D Lie algebra [SOLVED]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in Lie algebra, specifically examining the isomorphism between two Lie algebras defined by matrices in GL2 over the complex numbers. The original poster attempts to prove the conditions under which two Lie algebras are isomorphic based on their commutation relations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore methods to relate the basis vectors of the two Lie algebras through a change of basis matrix. There are discussions about the implications of the commutation relations and how to derive relationships between the parameters of the matrices involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the proposed approach and seek validation of their reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships among the parameters without reaching a consensus on the method or outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is situated within a graduate-level context, which may influence the complexity and depth of the discussion. There are hints at the possibility of posting in non-homework sections for broader feedback.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Difficult 3D Lie algebra

Homework Statement



Let \left(\begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array}\right) \in GL_2(\mathbb{C}).

Consider the Lie algebra \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,c,d)} with basis {x,y,z} relations given by
[x,y]= ay + cz
[x,z] = by + dz
[y,z] = 0

Show that \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,c,d)} \cong \mathfrak{g}_{(a',b',c',d')}; \iff \left(\begin{array}{cc} a' & b' \\ c' & d' \end{array}\right) = \lambda g \left(\begin{array}{cc} a & b\\ c & d \end{array}\right) g^{-1}\; \exists \lambda \in \mathbb{C}^\times, g \in GL_2(\mathbb{C})


The Attempt at a Solution



Right now I'm struggling to prove this in either direction so let me start with \implies. Since the Lie algebras are isomorphic (via \psi : \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,d,c)} \to \mathfrak{g}_{(a',b',c',d')} say), the images of the basis vectors satisfy the commutation relations of \mathfrak{g}_{(a,b,d,c)}, ie

[\psi x,\psi y]= a\psi y + c\psi z
[\psi x,\psi z] = b \psi y + d\psi z
[\psi y,\psi z] = 0

Moreover, \mathfrak{g}_{(a',b'c',d')} has a basis {x',y',z'}, with the following commutation relations

[x',y']= a'y' + c'z'
[x',z'] = b' y' + d' z'
[y',z'] = 0

My plan was to relate one basis to the other using a change of basis matrix (x',y',z')^T = A \cdot (\psi x,\psi y,\psi z)^T. Then plugging each equation for x',y',z' into the commutators in the above commutation relations I hoped to obtain a relationship amongst (a,b,c,d) and (a',b',c',d').

The result was something like

\left(\begin{array}{cc} a' & c' \\ b' & d' \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} y' \\ z'\end{array} \right)= B\left(\begin{array}{c}\psi y\\\psi z\end{array} \right)

where B is a matrix involving a,b,c,d and the entries of A. There is one extra relationship from [y',z'] = 0 which connects a,b,c,d and the entries of A, but I don't know how to use this.


Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could anyone suggest if this is even the correct plan of attack?

I've been thinking about this for hours but am getting nowhere. Somehow I need to find a relationship amongst the matrices (a,b,c,d) and (a',b',c',d') without those column vectors of basis vectors in there.
 
Let the Lie brackets [,] and [,]' work over a common vector space V.

A is invertible then \{ay + cz, by + dz \} is a basis for \mathbb{C}\{y,z\}. Thus \{[x,y],[x,z] \} is a basis so \mathbb{C}\{x,y\} is composed entirely of Lie brackets. This shows that \psi([y,z]) = [\psi y, \psi z].

Define two linear maps \varphi : \mathbb{C}{y,z} \to V ; w \mapsto [x,w] and \varphi' : \mathbb{C}{y,z} \to V ; w \mapsto [\varphi(x),w]. Then the isomorphism condition becomes for the first two commutation relations that

\varphi_{\mathbb{C}\{ a,b \}} \circ \varphi = \varphi' \circ \varphi_{\mathbb{C}}.

The matrix for \varphi is A. If the coefficient of x in \varphi(x) is alpha, say, then the matrix for \varphi' is A', because all commutators of y with z vanish. Thus in terms of matrices we have

g A = \alpha A'g. Which is what we set out to prove.
 
Note that for grad level HW questions, it is okay to post in the non HW sections of PF, where you have more chance of getting a reply.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K