Homogenous Solution Represents the Transient Response Right?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of the Homogeneous Solution in representing the Transient Response of a mechanical system, specifically an N-DOF spring, mass, and damper system. It is established that the Homogeneous Solution can represent the Transient Response, particularly when the Particular Solution is not transient. The conversation references a mathematical example involving the differential equation dy/dt + y = exp(-t), illustrating how both Homogeneous and Particular Solutions can contribute to the overall Transient Response. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding these solutions in the context of initial conditions and system stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of N-DOF mechanical systems
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their solutions
  • Knowledge of Homogeneous and Particular Solutions in system dynamics
  • Basic principles of stability in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of Homogeneous Solutions in linear differential equations
  • Explore the concept of Transient Response in mechanical systems
  • Learn about initial conditions and their impact on system behavior
  • Investigate real-world applications of transient analysis in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, system dynamics analysts, and students studying control systems who seek to deepen their understanding of transient responses in mechanical systems.

ltkach2015
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
CONCEPTUAL QUESTIONS:

-
Does the Homogenous Solution represent the Transient Response?

Let me specify. For a N-DOF spring, mass, and damper mechanical system:

-Does the Homogenous Solution represent the Transient Response for given mechanical system?

MY ANSWER:

Yes.

ASSUMPTIONS:
-only stable systems are consideredWHERE I AM GETTING CONFUSED:
According to Swarthmore University [Link listed]:
http://lpsa.swarthmore.edu/Transient/TransZIZStime.html

QUOTE:

Finding the homogeneous and particular solutions is a general technique for solving differential equations of the sort that we will encounter (different inputs require different forms of the particular response, but we will only consider step inputs (i.e., the input is constant for t>0) for now. However, contemplation of the technique begs the question: What, physically, do the homogeneous and particular response represent. The particular response represents the response of the system after any initial transients have died out, but the the homogeneous response doesn't really represent anything physical. The reason we use it is that it is mathematically correct and yields the right answer.

END QUOTE. (You can search that and Cltrl F (Command F) and paste that quote to find where this is listed)



Please note:

If their statement is only applicable to electrical systems. Then can you tell me how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you should let them confuse you. Swarthmore isn't CalTech or MIT ...
But they do have a nice website :smile:
 
BvU said:
I don't think you should let them confuse you. Swarthmore isn't CalTech or MIT ...
But they do have a nice website :smile:

Ok. Yes it is interesting.

Thank you for the reply.
 
BvU said:
I don't think you should let them confuse you. Swarthmore isn't CalTech or MIT ...
But they do have a nice website :smile:

So, I was beginning to build a new and deeper understanding when I noticed that Particular Solutions can also be transient:
Thus in that scenario, I believe, the Particular Solutions can, jointly, represent the Transient Response. And as expected there isn't a Steady State Response because the system returns to equilibrium, so the Total Response is transient because it is the Transient Response.

Then...I was presented with an example (via email) from a Professor at Swarthmore (listed below);
It basically counters my new understanding that the Homogenous Solution, completely or at least jointly, represent the Transient Response.

WARNING LOTS OF MATH MANIPULATIONS BELOW (skip to Bold Blue Terms)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Begin Math---------------------------------

Example: dy/dt + y = exp(-t) ; Initial Conditions: y(t=0) = 0, & dy/dt(t=0) = 0
To find the total solution I tried two techniques: 1) Integrating Factors 2) Summing Complementary (Homogenous) and Particular Solutions.
1) Integrating Factors
let:
mu = exp(int(coefficient of y*dt)) = exp(int(1*dt)) = exp(t)
multiply ODE by mu:
mu*dy/dt + mu*y = mu*exp(-t) = exp(t)*exp(-t) = 1
noticing product rule:
d/dt*[exp(t)*y] = 1
integrating both sides:
y*exp(t) = t+C
Initial Conditions:
y(t) = exp(-t)*(t+C) => y(0) = 0 = exp(-0)*(0+C) => C = 0
Total Solution by Integrating Factor Technique:
y(t) = t*exp(-t)
2) Sum of Complementary (Homogenous) Solution and Particular Solution
Complementary (Homogenous) Solution: set right hand side of ODE equal to zero, and then can just do typical integration or can assume solution to be yh = A*exp(t)
I chose to do the typical integration:

dy/dt + y = 0 => dy/dt = -y => 1/y *dy = -dt
log|y| +C1 = -t log here is natural logarithm
exp(log|y|) = exp(-t-C1) => yh(t) = exp(-t)*exp(-C1); if you did this by assumption/guess then your A would be equal to the exponential of C1
Particular Solution: referred to textbook for this one because if I assume a particular solution of the form of that similar to RHS of ODE yp(t) = B*exp(-t) then I duplicate the complementary/homogenous solution i.e.: dy/dt + y = -Aexp(-t) + A*exp(-t) = exp(-t) = A*[-exp(-t)+exp(-t)] = exp(-t) = A[0] = exp(-t) => cannot determine A

Instead assuming: yp(t) = B*t*exp(-t); by reasoning above
dy/dt + y = exp(-t) = Aexp(-t)-A*t*exp(-t)+A*t*exp(-t) = exp(-t) = A*exp(-t) = exp(-t) => A = 1 => yp(t) = t*exp(-t) due to assumed solution [different than just B*exp(-t)]
Apply Initial Conditions to Total Solution:
y(t) = yh(t) + yp(t) = exp(-t)*exp(-C1) + t*exp(-t) => y(0) = 0 = exp(-0)*exp(-C1) +0*exp(-0) => exp(-C1) = 0 => C1 = infinitely large number that drives exponent to zero
y(t) = exp(-t)*exp(-infinity) + t*exp(-t) = exp(-t)*0 + t*exp(-t) = 0 + t*exp(-t); => yh(t) = 0 due to zero initial conditions
Total Solution by Complementary (Homogenous) Solution and Particular Solution :
y(t) = 0 + t*exp(-t); notice both methods result in same


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------End Math---------------------------------

Questions: (3)
1) I think that the Homogenous Solution does not always solely represent the Transient Response. What's more, if the Homogenous Solution is zero then it does not represent any part of the Transient Response (and it should go without saying that it doesn't represent any part of the total response)
So, to keep it general: the Homogenous Solution, if non-zero, typically and solely represents the Transient Response provided the Particular Solution isn't transient.
2) How can there, physically, be a particular solution without a homogenous solution? Is it just because, mathematically, it's due to zero initial conditions? Does this occasionally or quite often happen?
3) Also, what real life examples has an input (forcing function?) that is exponentially decreasing with time or rather a particular solution that represents, or partially represents (if the homogenous solution is non zero) the Transient Response?

Comment:
I think the example is misleading because it sort of makes one think that if the Particular Solution is transient then the Homogenous Solution must be zero.
That's definitely not always the case.

You can have, at least mathematically, a Particular Solution that is transient and likewise a Homogenous Solution that is non-zero and thus both solutions together represent the Transient Response. (Again there isn't a Steady State Response here, and thus the Total Response is the Transient Response; only response )
 
Last edited:
I think you have it all figured out prety well -- and I stand corrected for sure. Must be the usual physicists sloppiness taking the usual case for always true. In defence: transient particular solutions (such as step response) are easily singled out and often dealt with using other methods.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K