Homology Groups of the Klein Bottle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Klein
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Theorem 6.3 from James Munkres' "Elements of Algebraic Topology," which states that the homology groups of the Klein Bottle are H_1(S) = ℤ ⊕ ℤ/2 and H_2(S) = 0. The proof involves identifying cycles and boundaries, leading to the conclusion that H_1(S) = Z_1(S) / B_1(S) = ℤ ⊕ ℤ/2ℤ. A key point of confusion arises regarding the interpretation of the expression ℤ ⊕ ℤ/2, specifically whether it denotes a direct sum or a quotient.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of homology groups in algebraic topology
  • Familiarity with the concepts of cycles and boundaries in topological spaces
  • Knowledge of direct sums and quotient groups in abstract algebra
  • Basic understanding of Munkres' "Elements of Algebraic Topology"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Theorem 6.3 in Munkres' "Elements of Algebraic Topology"
  • Learn about the properties of direct sums and quotient groups in algebra
  • Explore the concept of homology groups in more complex topological spaces
  • Review examples of homology groups for other surfaces, such as the torus and the sphere
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in algebraic topology, particularly those studying homology groups and their applications in understanding the properties of surfaces like the Klein Bottle.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading James Munkres' book, Elements of Algebraic Topology.

Theorem 6.3 on page 37 concerns the homology groups of the Klein Bottle.

Theorem 6.3 demonstrates that the homology groups for the Klein Bottle are as follows:

H_1 (S) = \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}/2

and

H_2 (S) = 0

I need some help following a key part of the proof.

The relevant section of the proof is as follows:

attachment.php?attachmentid=68914&stc=1&d=1398136653.jpg


(To provide context to this post, the full theorem and proof is given at the end of this post - see below)

My understanding of the above part of Munkres' proof is as follows:

Munkres establishes that a cycles in S are of the form

c = n w_1 + m z_1

so that Z_1 (S) = \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}

Munkres also establishes that boundaries are of the form

c = (2p) z_1

so that B_1 (S) = 2 \mathbb{Z}

Thus, so far as I can see we then have:

H_1 (S) = Z_1(S) / B_1 (S) = \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}/ 2 \mathbb{Z}

BUT ... how does this tally with Munkres expression

H_1 (S) = \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}/2?

Indeed what does \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}/2 mean?

(I am not even sure whether the expression is

H_1 (S) = ( \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}) /2

or

H_1 (S) = \mathbb{Z} \oplus (\mathbb{Z}/2)

Hope someone can help.

The full text of Theorem 6.3 and its proof are as follows:

attachment.php?attachmentid=68915&stc=1&d=1398136653.jpg


Hope someone can help.

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Theorem 6.3 - key part of proof - Page 37 - Munkres - Elements of Algebraic Topology.jpg
    Theorem 6.3 - key part of proof - Page 37 - Munkres - Elements of Algebraic Topology.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 806
  • Theorem 6.3 - Page 37 - Munkres - Elements of Algebraic Topology.jpg
    Theorem 6.3 - Page 37 - Munkres - Elements of Algebraic Topology.jpg
    44.4 KB · Views: 867
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing, the quotient ##\mathbb Z / \mathbb 2Z ## is isomomorphic to the group ## \mathbb Z/2##, and the expression ##\mathbb Z (+) \mathbb Z/2 ## is the direct sum of rings/modules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K