Homomorphic normed linear spaces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tuananh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 3K views
tuananh
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all experts,
I've just visitted another Maths forum and picked up two interesting questions:
Question 1. Let H and K be homomorphic normed linear spaces. Is it necessary that H and K have the same dimension if both H and K are finite-dimension ? Is there possible a homomorphism between an infinite-dimension normed space and a finite-dimension one ?
Question 2. If f is a homomorphism between two normed linear spaces, is f necessary uniformly continuous ?
Hope to get your ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By saying "H and K is homomorphic", I mean that there is an one-to-one mapping f from H to K such that both f and f^{-1} (the inverse of f) are continous. Perhaps, this concept should be called "isomorphic" and sorry if I made a mistake.

If H=R and K=R^2, I think R and R^2 cannot be holomorphic because if we remove a point of R, such as x, then R\{x} is no longer a connected set, but R^2\{f(x)} is still a connected set. Here, f is an one-to-one from R to R^2 such that f and f^{-1} are continuos.
 
To show R^n is not isomorphic to R^m as a vector space for n[itex]\neq[/itex]m, you can just show that isomorphism preserves dimension (ie, show a basis is mapped to a basis). Showing they are not homeomorphic as topological spaces is much more difficult. It can be done using cut points as in post 3 for n=1, but above this you need more advanced tools from algebraic topology. And what do you mean by uniformly continuous?
 
real normed linear spaces of finite dimension are probably always isomorphic to R^n. then they are determined by their homeomorphism type i would guess. a proof tends to involve homology theory.