Homomorphisms into an Algebraically Closed Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on extending embeddings from an integral closure L into an algebraically closed field K, particularly focusing on algebraic extensions F of L. It is established that if F is a finite extension of L, the embedding can be extended to K. For infinite extensions, the extension follows from the finite case through Zorn's lemma, which is crucial for constructing the embedding incrementally. The conversation emphasizes the importance of well-orderings and the ordering of maps in the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic extensions and integral closure
  • Familiarity with algebraically closed fields
  • Knowledge of Zorn's lemma and its applications in set theory
  • Concepts of transfinite induction and well-orderings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Zorn's lemma in algebraic contexts
  • Explore the properties of algebraically closed fields in depth
  • Learn about transfinite induction techniques in algebra
  • Investigate the structure of algebraic extensions and their embeddings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebra, field theory, and set theory, will benefit from this discussion, as well as students seeking to understand the complexities of embeddings in algebraically closed fields.

Spartan Math
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I'm trying to finish of a problem on integral closure and I am rather unsure if the following fact is true:

If L embeds into an algebraically closed field K and F is an algebraic extension of L, then it is possible to extend the embedding of L to F into K.

Now the case where F is a finite extension of L is true, but not quite so sure about the infinite case.

Thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spartan Math said:
Now the case where F is a finite extension of L is true, but not quite so sure about the infinite case.
The infinite case follows from the finite one by an application of Zorn's lemma.
 
and how exactly does one do that?
 
If you're not a Zorn's Lemma type, then maybe you're a transfinite induction type? Adjoin elements of F to L one at a time, and construct F --> K one bit at a time. Mutter something about well-orderings so that this makes sense.
 
Well, I'm very much a Zorn's Lemma type, if you will. I just wasn't exactly sure how to go about using it.
 
Well, you want to prove the existence of a map from an algebraic extension of L to K, and you already know particular instances. So most naïvely, it seems you'd want the objects of your poset to be such maps.

Then, you'd need an ordering relation to say when one object L-->E-->K is "bigger" than another object L-->F-->K.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K