Honors Physics Momentum Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a perfectly elastic collision problem involving two ice pucks: a 0.45 kg puck moving east at 3 m/s and a 0.9 kg puck initially at rest. The conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations are applied to determine the final velocities of both pucks after the collision. The key equations used include the kinetic energy formula KE = 1/2 * m * v² and the momentum formula P = m * v. It is clarified that while kinetic energy is not conserved in all scenarios, total energy remains conserved in this context due to the absence of potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy calculations
  • Knowledge of perfectly elastic collisions
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of final velocities in perfectly elastic collisions
  • Learn about the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Explore the implications of energy conservation in various physical systems
  • Practice solving additional problems involving momentum and kinetic energy
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and collision problems, as well as educators looking for examples of momentum conservation in elastic collisions.

fantolay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A .45kg ice puck, moving east with a speed of 3 m/s has a head-on collision with a .9 kg puck initially at rest. Assuming a perfectly elastic collision, what will be the speed and direction of each object after the collision?

M1 = .45kg
M2 = .9kg
V1 = 3m/s
V2 = 0m/s

Perfectly elastic collision means Kinetic Energy and Momentum are conserved.

Homework Equations



KE = 1.2 * m * v2
P = m * v


The Attempt at a Solution



KEI = KEF (Initial KE = Final KE)
1/2 * m1 * v12 + 1/2 * m2 * v22 = 1/2 * m1 * (v1')2 + 1/2 * m2 * (v2')2

and

PI=PF
m1 * v1 + m2 * v2 = m1 * v1' + m2 * v2'

I don't really know where to go from here or if this is the right start...

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do have the right start. The rest is just really ugly algebra and moving things around.

Also, there is no such thing as kinetic energy conservation. Kinetic energy is not conserve, but energy is conserve. It just happens that there is no potential energy in your problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K