Hooke's Law. Does this spring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on Hooke's Law and its application to a spring's behavior under force. The consensus is that the spring does obey Hooke's Law, as indicated by the linear relationship between force and displacement on the graph. The force constant (k) was recalculated correctly as 1.5 N/m, and the force required to stretch the spring 17 cm was determined to be 8.5 N, confirming the linearity of the relationship. The initial misunderstanding regarding the equality of force and displacement values was clarified, emphasizing that Hooke's Law relates magnitudes rather than direct equality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law (F = kx)
  • Knowledge of linear relationships in physics
  • Familiarity with force and displacement units (N, m, cm)
  • Ability to interpret graphs in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Hooke's Law in different materials
  • Learn about the concept of spring constants and their units
  • Explore the differences between elastic and inelastic materials
  • Investigate real-world applications of Hooke's Law in engineering and design
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to force and elasticity in materials.

valeriex0x
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A student measures the force required to stretch a spring by various amounts and makes the graph shown in the figure, which plots this force as a function of the distance the spring has stretched.
Part A) Does this spring obey Hooke's Law?
Part B) What is the force constant of the spring in N/m?
Part C) What force would be needed to stretch the spring a distance of 17 cm from its unstretched length, assuming that it continues to obey Hooke's Law (F=N)?


Homework Equations



F is proportional to displacement x
F=-kx
k=delta f/delta x

The Attempt at a Solution



We didnt cover this in class yet, but I know that a hookean body gets displaced, and once the force is removed it goes back to its original position. Which means that the displacement along the x-axis is the same as the force applied to it.

For part A) I would say No, the spring does not obey Hooke's Law.
For part B) I get -1/2 N/m from F=-kx 5=(-x) 2.5
For part C) -17N from F=(-k ) 17cm
 

Attachments

  • Yg.5.58.jpg
    Yg.5.58.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 2,175
Physics news on Phys.org
they might mean absolute values of force and displacement and you just should treat it as F=kx. Because negative k would mean that when your spring is stretched, it tends to be streched even more. And when it is contracted, it tends to be contracted even more.

(A) Why do you think so? And if it doesn't obey, how can you use it to solve parts (B) and (C)?

(B) Suppose you are right and k=-1/2. Then from your expression: F=-kx=-(-1/2 N/m)*2.5 m=1.25 N which is not equal to 5 N

(C) Suppose you were right in part (B) and k=-1/2. Then F=-(-1/2 N/cm)*17 cm = 8.5 N not equal to 17 N.

Please, think a little more about all three parts and post the next iteration of your solution.
 
I originally thought the answer to Part A) was No, because when I looked at the graph, when x=5, y is not equal to 5. I thought that is something obeyed Hooke's Law both the x and y value would be 5, and again when x=10, y would be 10. I entered the reponse "No" into mastering physics and they told me I was wrong, so obsivoulsy I entered Yes and then got it correct. Was I wrong in my thinking to believe that they are supposed to be equal? Or is it okay that the x and y values are not equal just so long as the graph is linear?

Can you just explain why my first answer was incorrect? Or did I kind of figure it out with the above response.
 
For Part B I calculated:

ΔF/Δx
(15-7.5)/(10-5)=1.5

Am i on the right track?
 
part (B) is correct now in N/cm. But if you need answer in SI, you need to transfer it to SI.

for part A,
you can't expect force and displacement to be equal to each other or not because they have different dimensions.

imagine that it had x=5 when y=5 etc. Now let's measure x in meters instead of centimeters. and you'd have x=0.05 when y=5 when nothing actually changed in your system.

Hooke's law just says that force depends on displacement linearly with some coefficient k, F=kx (talking about magnitudes). This coefficient compensates the difference in dimensions of F and x (N/cm or N/m).

As your graph is straight line, answer is "Yes", force depends on displacement linearly. If it were parabola or circle of sin or etc, you would answer "No".
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K