Hooke's Law on a Slope with friction.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Hooke's Law in the context of a mass on a slope with friction. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the system, particularly focusing on energy conservation and the behavior of a harmonic oscillator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of energy conservation and the work done against friction. There are attempts to relate the problem to harmonic motion and considerations of potential energy changes.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, including hints about energy conservation and the work done by forces. Some participants express uncertainty about specific calculations and the implications of changing forces over distance.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as the need to consider the work done against friction and the varying force at different points in the motion. There is also a reference to homework rules that may limit the type of guidance provided.

RCulling
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question is in attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I mananged to find the acceleration up the slope but cannot get any further than this?
- can someone please give me hint; push in the right direction

Thanks :D
 

Attachments

  • Physics Study.jpg
    Physics Study.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 554
Physics news on Phys.org
Better image here
 

Attachments

  • Physics Study.jpg
    Physics Study.jpg
    37.1 KB · Views: 574
Hint (again): energy conservation.
 
Solve it as a harmonic oscillator, but add a constant to the position, so that x(0)=constant. Solve for that constant, and the rest should follow.

Edit: Oh, wow, energy conservation is a lot easier. Never mind.
 
Mmm energy conservation i get, I am just trying to figure out the work done?
I've the force at the most compressed point, but it changes over the 0.2m it acts upon?
- what am i missing?
 
You can separate out the work done against friction. Kinetic energy is trivial. All that's left is to consider gravitational and spring potentials at 0 and at D.
 
Ok thanks for the helping hints, i'll post back if i still can't get it

- Cheers :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K