Hooke's Law: Spring Force Negative?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of Hooke's Law, specifically the implications of negative force values when a spring is stretched. Participants explore the concepts of force direction, magnitude, and vector representation in the context of a spring system, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over the negative value of force calculated using Hooke's Law (F = -kx) when the displacement x is positive, questioning the meaning of negative force in terms of magnitude.
  • Others clarify that the negative sign indicates direction, suggesting that force is a vector quantity with both magnitude and direction.
  • A participant points out that while the magnitude of a force is always positive, the negative sign in Hooke's Law indicates that the force acts in the opposite direction of the displacement.
  • There is a discussion about how to express force in vector form, with suggestions that a negative force value can be represented as a vector pointing in the negative direction.
  • Some participants propose using the absolute value of force (|F|) to denote magnitude, while others emphasize the importance of understanding the vector nature of force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the vector nature of force and the interpretation of negative values as directional indicators. However, there remains some uncertainty regarding the representation of force magnitude and the implications of negative values in practical terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of force direction and magnitude without resolving the nuances of how to consistently express these concepts in different contexts.

Mouadys
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Following Hooke's law, the force applied by a string on an object attached to one of its ends is F = -kx
But here is my question : if we consider the equilibrium coordinate x=0 of a horizontal string, and the string is stretched until its end reaches a coordinate x1>0. By applying hooke's law we find F = -k*x1 but since x1>0 so that means F<0, but as I know the magnitude of a force cannot be negative...so am I missing something or should I use |F| for magnitude or what ?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mouadys said:
Hello,
Following Hooke's law, the force applied by a string on an object attached to one of its ends is F = -kx
But here is my question : if we consider the equilibrium coordinate x=0 of a horizontal string, and the string is stretched until its end reaches a coordinate x1>0. By applying hooke's law we find F = -k*x1 but since x1>0 so that means F<0, but as I know the magnitude of a force cannot be negative...so am I missing something or should I use |F| for magnitude or what ?

Thank you
Welcome to the PF.

Of course it can. It all depends on coordinates. Have you learned about vectors yet? (Vectors have a magnitude and a direction). :smile:
 
##\vec F=-k(\vec x-\vec x_{eqbm})##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

Of course it can. It all depends on coordinates. Have you learned about vectors yet? (Vectors have a magnitude and a direction). :smile:
Thank you for answering.

In fact, yes I have learned about vectors but I personally have never seen a negative magnitude, and since as I have studied the magnitude of a vector is ||F|| = sqrt(Fx^2 + Fy^2 ...) so doesn't this basically mean the magnitude of F is |Fx| ? ( Fx = -kx)
 
Just think about a mass initially at x=0 with a spring that goes off to the left. It is on a frictionless horizontal surface.

You pull the mass out to the right at x=1cm and let it go. What happens next?
 
berkeman said:
Just think about a mass initially at x=0 with a spring that goes off to the left. It is on a frictionless horizontal surface.

You pull the mass out to the right at x=1cm and let it go. What happens next?
It just goes back to x=0 (and negative values depending on k) under the effect of a force directed from right to left.
 
Mouadys said:
It just goes back to x=0 (and negative values depending on k)
If it rests on a frictionless surface, it oscillates back and forth to +/- 1cm. What are the forces on the mass as it oscillates? Include the magnitude of the force in the x direction... :smile:
 
Mouadys said:
It just goes back to x=0
So what direction must the force point for that to happen?
 
Dale said:
So what direction must the force point for that to happen?
It goes from the right to the left, and I get that spring force has an opposite direction of the stretching/compression.
What worries me is getting a force with a negative value, which is something I have never seen, as I always hear that the magnitude of a force is always positive.
 
  • #10
Mouadys said:
It goes from the right to the left, and I get that spring force has an opposite direction of the stretching/compression.
That is what the negative sign means. The negative of a vector simply points in the opposite direction.

Mouadys said:
What worries me is getting a force with a negative value, which is something I have never seen, as I always hear that the magnitude of a force is always positive.
That is true. The magnitude of x is the same as the magnitude of -x and both are positive.
 
  • #11
Dale said:
That is what the negative sign means. The negative of a vector simply points in the opposite direction.

That is true. The magnitude of x is the same as the magnitude of -x and both are positive.
Then how would I explain a stretch of x=1m to result in a positive force magnitude ?
Let's take K=2N/m
F = -2*1=-2N
It gives a negative value
Whilst with x=-1 F=2N
So am I supposed to use |F| to write magnitude or what ?
 
  • #12
Mouadys said:
Then how would I explain a stretch of x=1m to result in a positive force magnitude ?
Let's take K=2N/m
F = -2*1=-2N
It gives a negative value
Whilst with x=-1 F=2N
So am I supposed to use |F| to write magnitude or what ?
Remember that force is a vector. So a force of -2 N is a force of magnitude 2 N pointing in the -x direction. Properly it should be written as F = (-2,0,0) N to make it clear that it is a vector, but in this case the 0 components are supposed to be understood from the context.

And, yes, if you want to show the magnitude of a force you can write |F|. In this case that would be |(-2,0,0)| = 2.
 
  • #13
Now I got it thank you very much for your support.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K