Horizontal force F applied so the relative postion stays constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the horizontal force F required to maintain the relative position of two masses, m1 and m2, on a system with a total mass of 30 kg. The initial calculation yielded a force of 235.44 N, but the correct answer is 392 N, as confirmed by the participants. The confusion arose from the application of fictitious forces and the balance of forces acting on m1 and m2. Ultimately, the correct approach involved recognizing the tension in the cord and the need to accurately account for the masses involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with fictitious forces in accelerating reference frames
  • Basic knowledge of tension in strings and forces acting on objects
  • Ability to perform vector calculations involving forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of fictitious forces in non-inertial reference frames
  • Learn how to derive tension in a string using vector components
  • Explore advanced problems involving multiple masses and forces
  • Practice calculating forces in systems with varying mass distributions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering dynamics and force calculations in mechanical systems.

Ithilrandir
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Referring to Fig. 5-4: What horizontal force F must be constantly applied to M=21kg so that m1 = 5kg does not move relative to m2 = 4 kg. Neglect friction.
Relevant Equations
...
g=9.81
m2g=m1a,
a=(m2/m1)g=0.8g

F=0.8g x (M+m1+m2)= 0.8g x (21+5+4)= 0.8g x 30= 235.44 N.

The answer key however indicate that the answer is 392N. This made me think that the tilt of m2 has something to do with it, but I can't see how much it will make F larger than the above answer.
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2021-01-24 at 9.49.06 PM.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2021-01-24 at 9.49.06 PM.jpeg
    15 KB · Views: 197
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if ##F = 0##, then ##m_2## will fall vertically. But, if ##F \ne 0##, then ##m_2## will be pushed to the left relative to the accelerating system. You definitely have to take that into account.
 
I see. Is it right to say then that m2 will experience a relative leftward acceleration = F/(30kg)?
 
Ithilrandir said:
I see. Is it right to say then that m2 will experience a relative leftward acceleration = F/(30kg)?
That's the acceleration of the CoM of the system, right?

So, what do we add to the usual Newton's laws here?
 
I don't think I caught your hint. I was thinking of making m1 accelerate left relative to M so that m2 do not move relative to m1, but I'm a little confused at where to go from there.
 
Ithilrandir said:
I don't think I caught your hint.
Have you heard of a fictictious (or inertial) force?
 
Yes, I have heard of fictitious force, but I don't know how I to apply it properly as I'm doing the questions with only the lecture as reference. The fictitious force acting on m2 is to the left, so I balance the forces acting on m2 from the reference of M, then convert back to the normal frame of reference?
 
Ithilrandir said:
Yes, I have heard of fictitious force, but I don't know how I to apply it properly as I'm doing the questions with only the lecture as reference. The fictitious force acting on m2 is to the left, so I balance the forces acting on m2 from the reference of M, then convert back to the normal frame of reference?
You don't need to go back to the normal reference frame, as you are asked for the case when there is no relative motion. That condition is independent of the reference frame.
 
I balanced the forces at the string with T being the square root of (m2g) ^2 + m2a, F=(M + m1 + m2)a.

From here, since T and a are unknown, I had no clue how to carry on. I tried to work backwards from the answer but didn't see any connection.
 
  • #10
Ithilrandir said:
I balanced the forces at the string with T being the square root of (m2g) ^2 + m2a, F=(M + m1 + m2)a.

From here, since T and a are unknown, I had no clue how to carry on. I tried to work backwards from the answer but didn't see any connection.
I hope you mean ##T =\sqrt{(m_2g) ^2 + (m_2a)^2}##.

What about the balance of forces on m1?
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
I hope you mean ##T =\sqrt{(m_2g) ^2 + (m_2a)^2}##.

What about the balance of forces on m1?

From the reference of M, on m1 it's T to the right and m1g downwards if I'm not mistaken.
 
  • #12
Ithilrandir said:
From the reference of M, on m1 it's T to the right and m1g downwards if I'm not mistaken.
So what keeps it place on M? Don't forget the fictitious force.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
So what keeps it place on M? Don't forget the fictitious force.
The fictitious force is to the left, but that doesn't seem to be the only force holding it.
 
  • #14
Ithilrandir said:
The fictitious force is to the left, but that doesn't seem to be the only force holding it.
You already identified the tension in the cord. The fictitious force is the only other force with a horizontal component. So what equation can you write?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
You already identified the tension in the cord. The fictitious force is the only other force with a horizontal component. So what equation can you write?
I managed to solve it:smile:. I had been mixing up the masses in my calculations. T=m1a, solving for a then multiplying a with 30(total mass) gets the correct F of 392N.
 
  • #16
Ithilrandir said:
I managed to solve it:smile:. I had been mixing up the masses in my calculations. T=m1a, solving for a then multiplying a with 30(total mass) gets the correct F of 392N.
Ok!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K