Horizontal force F applied so the relative postion stays constant

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
15 replies · 2K views
Ithilrandir
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Referring to Fig. 5-4: What horizontal force F must be constantly applied to M=21kg so that m1 = 5kg does not move relative to m2 = 4 kg. Neglect friction.
Relevant Equations
...
g=9.81
m2g=m1a,
a=(m2/m1)g=0.8g

F=0.8g x (M+m1+m2)= 0.8g x (21+5+4)= 0.8g x 30= 235.44 N.

The answer key however indicate that the answer is 392N. This made me think that the tilt of m2 has something to do with it, but I can't see how much it will make F larger than the above answer.
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2021-01-24 at 9.49.06 PM.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2021-01-24 at 9.49.06 PM.jpeg
    15 KB · Views: 222
Physics news on Phys.org
I see. Is it right to say then that m2 will experience a relative leftward acceleration = F/(30kg)?
 
Ithilrandir said:
I see. Is it right to say then that m2 will experience a relative leftward acceleration = F/(30kg)?
That's the acceleration of the CoM of the system, right?

So, what do we add to the usual Newton's laws here?
 
I don't think I caught your hint. I was thinking of making m1 accelerate left relative to M so that m2 do not move relative to m1, but I'm a little confused at where to go from there.
 
Yes, I have heard of fictitious force, but I don't know how I to apply it properly as I'm doing the questions with only the lecture as reference. The fictitious force acting on m2 is to the left, so I balance the forces acting on m2 from the reference of M, then convert back to the normal frame of reference?
 
Ithilrandir said:
Yes, I have heard of fictitious force, but I don't know how I to apply it properly as I'm doing the questions with only the lecture as reference. The fictitious force acting on m2 is to the left, so I balance the forces acting on m2 from the reference of M, then convert back to the normal frame of reference?
You don't need to go back to the normal reference frame, as you are asked for the case when there is no relative motion. That condition is independent of the reference frame.
 
I balanced the forces at the string with T being the square root of (m2g) ^2 + m2a, F=(M + m1 + m2)a.

From here, since T and a are unknown, I had no clue how to carry on. I tried to work backwards from the answer but didn't see any connection.
 
Ithilrandir said:
I balanced the forces at the string with T being the square root of (m2g) ^2 + m2a, F=(M + m1 + m2)a.

From here, since T and a are unknown, I had no clue how to carry on. I tried to work backwards from the answer but didn't see any connection.
I hope you mean ##T =\sqrt{(m_2g) ^2 + (m_2a)^2}##.

What about the balance of forces on m1?
 
haruspex said:
I hope you mean ##T =\sqrt{(m_2g) ^2 + (m_2a)^2}##.

What about the balance of forces on m1?

From the reference of M, on m1 it's T to the right and m1g downwards if I'm not mistaken.
 
haruspex said:
So what keeps it place on M? Don't forget the fictitious force.
The fictitious force is to the left, but that doesn't seem to be the only force holding it.
 
Ithilrandir said:
The fictitious force is to the left, but that doesn't seem to be the only force holding it.
You already identified the tension in the cord. The fictitious force is the only other force with a horizontal component. So what equation can you write?
 
haruspex said:
You already identified the tension in the cord. The fictitious force is the only other force with a horizontal component. So what equation can you write?
I managed to solve it:smile:. I had been mixing up the masses in my calculations. T=m1a, solving for a then multiplying a with 30(total mass) gets the correct F of 392N.