How a solid body emits a lower frequency photon than absorbed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the phenomenon of a solid body emitting lower frequency photons than those it absorbs, specifically in the context of the Earth and the sun as black bodies. The sun emits high-frequency radiation due to its high temperature, while the Earth, being cooler, re-emits energy primarily in the infrared spectrum. The conversation highlights the mechanisms of energy transfer in molecules, emphasizing that energy absorbed can lead to rotational and vibrational motions rather than solely electron promotion. The participants conclude that molecular interactions in solids allow for energy dissipation in a continuous manner, which contributes to the conversion of higher frequency light into lower frequency radiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black body radiation and temperature effects
  • Familiarity with molecular vibration and rotation dynamics
  • Knowledge of photon absorption mechanisms in solids versus gases
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy in molecular systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of black body radiation and Planck's law
  • Study the role of molecular vibrations and rotations in energy absorption
  • Investigate the differences in photon absorption between solids and gases
  • Learn about statistical mechanics and its applications in condensed matter physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students interested in thermodynamics and condensed matter physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those exploring energy transfer mechanisms in molecular systems.

FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6
I’m trying to understand how a solid body changes the wavelength of radiation it re-radiates from that which it originally absorbed. I’m thinking in context to the way that the Earth absorbs higher frequency radiation from the sun, but when it re-emits the energy it’s at a much lower frequency.

What I *think I understand is that; approximating Earth and the sun as black bodies; the sun being at a much higher temperature radiates energy where the peak of the distribution is at a high frequency. The Earth absorbs the higher frequency energy and becomes “warmer”. When the Earth re-radiates the energy, because it’s at a much lower temperature, the distribution of radiation has a peak at a much lower frequency (IR).

But also I thought that heat radiation is transferred at discrete energies. Where IR radiation is absorbed in a molecule by causing rotation and vibration, and re-radiated at the same frequency. While higher frequency radiation is absorbed by promoting an electron to a high state, and when it falls back to ground state it emits a photon of the same energy/frequency. In solids I *think that electron energies exist in continuous bands, but I thought that the same would apply as in a gas, where a photon with energy hv of visible light promotes a single electron to a higher state, exactly hv greater, and then it emits another photon also with energy hv. So how is radiation ever “converted” from high frequency light to IR? I suppose that the IR is radiated due to rotation and vibration of molecules? ... So is the question I should be asking is “how is visible light converted to kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FrankJ777 said:
But also I thought that heat radiation is transferred at discrete energies. Where IR radiation is absorbed in a molecule by causing rotation and vibration, and re-radiated at the same frequency.

No, not necessarily. Once a molecule has absorbed energy and started vibrating, rotating, etc, it can often get rid of that energy in a continuous manner instead of a discrete manner. For example a molecule can collide with another molecule and lose half of the energy that it absorbed. Or a third. Or some other fraction. Or it could gain even more energy.

FrankJ777 said:
While higher frequency radiation is absorbed by promoting an electron to a high state, and when it falls back to ground state it emits a photon of the same energy/frequency.

This is only an accurate description for single atoms. Molecules have more degrees of freedom in which to interact and, and the larger the molecule the more degrees of freedom it has. This means that an electron can lose energy in more ways than just emitting a photon.

FrankJ777 said:
So is the question I should be asking is “how is visible light converted to kinetic energy?

Imagine that a photon is absorbed and the energy is transferred to the molecule in the form of the rotation of part of the molecule around another part. A collision between this molecule and another could transfer that rotational energy into kinetic energy for the 2nd molecule, sort of like a bat hitting a ball.
 
Thanks for the explanation!

If i can follow up though, I'm trying to think more specifically about higher frequency radiation (visible light). In solids, as opposed to gasses is there more possibility that a molecule can absorb photons through vibration, rotational modes, instead of electron promotion?

If a solid does absorb a photon through electron promotion, can the energy, or part of it be converted to rotation or vibration?

Also, just so I'm clear, I thought molecular vibration and rotation were "kinetic energy", is that correct?
 
FrankJ777 said:
If i can follow up though, I'm trying to think more specifically about higher frequency radiation (visible light). In solids, as opposed to gasses is there more possibility that a molecule can absorb photons through vibration, rotational modes, instead of electron promotion?

I believe so, but I confess I'm not an expert, so I can't offer any details.

FrankJ777 said:
If a solid does absorb a photon through electron promotion, can the energy, or part of it be converted to rotation or vibration?

That's a good question and I wish I knew enough to answer it. I think it can, but I don't know what the requirements would be for that to happen.

FrankJ777 said:
Also, just so I'm clear, I thought molecular vibration and rotation were "kinetic energy", is that correct?

I'm not sure. I was just thinking of translational motion as kinetic energy.
 
Awesome. I think you've cleared things up enough so that I can refine my question and possible post in the "Condensed matter" forum. It seems like this would be right up there alley. Also seems like a course in statistical mechanics would help. If I ever have time someday, I think I'll take one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K