How accurate can the shadow of a large sundial be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonathan212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shadow
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the accuracy of sundials, particularly focusing on how the size of a sundial might influence its precision in telling time. Participants explore various factors affecting sundial accuracy, including the Earth's rotation, atmospheric effects, and light diffraction, while considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that larger sundials could be more accurate, but acknowledge that shadows become less sharp at greater distances, introducing a trade-off.
  • One participant discusses the Earth's rotation and its effect on sundial accuracy, noting that the cumulative error can build to several minutes over time.
  • Another participant mentions the need to correct for the equation of time, which can introduce a ±15-minute error.
  • Light diffusion and atmospheric effects, such as heat haze and atmospheric refraction, are proposed as additional factors that may affect shadow sharpness.
  • Some participants raise questions about the wave nature of light and its potential impact on shadow accuracy, suggesting that diffraction could play a role.
  • There is a discussion about the use of optical systems like sextants for more accurate solar time readings compared to sundials.
  • One participant proposes that using a cylindrical style instead of a flat gnomon could improve accuracy by reducing edge diffraction effects.
  • Concerns are raised about the visibility of shadows and the influence of surrounding light conditions on reading sundials accurately.
  • Some participants debate specific numerical values related to diffraction and shadow illumination, with differing opinions on their significance.
  • The world's largest sundial is mentioned as a point of interest, but its relevance to the accuracy discussion is not elaborated upon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the factors affecting sundial accuracy, with no clear consensus on the maximum achievable accuracy or the significance of various effects. Disagreements arise regarding specific numerical claims and the interpretation of light behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the accuracy of sundials is influenced by multiple factors, including atmospheric conditions and the geometry of the sundial itself. Some assumptions about light behavior and diffraction effects remain unresolved, and the discussion includes speculative elements regarding the impact of these factors.

  • #31
gary350 said:
How to aim sun dial pointer at solar 12 noon? I think magnet north is wrong. True north is about 4 degree from magnet but which direction?
Magnetic Variation (UK) or Deviation (USA) is given on maps and sea charts. It varies a little with the exact location and also each year.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
At any time at night, you could line the gnomon up with the pole star. If you extend the style of the gnomon as a straight line it should point directly at the pole star.

A magnetic compass will not always give good results. The easiest way to first set up an experimental sundial is simply to set the shadow to 12 noon at midday.
To do it more accurately you will need to know the time of your local solar noon. You would need to adjust for the equation of time (±15minutes) using the date and analemma diagram, and you need to adjust for your position (±30 minutes) relative to the reference longitude of your time zone.
 
  • #33
Baluncore said:
At any time at night, you could line the gnomon up with the pole star. .

To do it more accurately you will need to know the time of your local solar noon. .

That is what I was asking, how to find solar noon at my location? Few days ago I looked up, sun rise & sun set at my zip code, chart shows time all day and at 12:50pm solar angle peaks. 12:50pm and 12:51pm are the same angle. I was looking for this chart again but can not find it I need to double check solar time.

I should have known to use north star I read in the Bible north star is only star in the sky that does not move. People at sea use north star for navigation. That will be hard in the dark and I live in TN we lots of tall trees. My back yard is donut circle of in center of trees.
 
  • #34
gary350 said:
Few days ago I looked up, sun rise & sun set at my zip code, chart shows time all day and at 12:50pm solar angle peaks.
That tells me that you now have "daylight saving", as the clock is 1 hour fast and reads about 1 PM when it is solar noon.
If you cannot align the gnomon with the pole star, then set the sundial to cast it's thin shadow on 12 noon when the sun is at it's highest point during the day.
Remember that a sundial reads local solar time which wanders through the year according to the analemma.
 
  • #36
gary350 said:
Can't find the original information but I found this, more accurate plus it lists solar noon as 12:50:54pm

It is interesting solar noon changes from 12:50 to 12:51 then 12:52 then 12:51 and so on. Some where I read this has something to do with Earth wobble & orgit not being perfect circle.

https://sunrise-sunset.org/us/murfreesboro-tn
 
  • #38
Answering my own question, the -6 dB is at v = 0 below. Ie even in the straight line from a point source to the knife edge and to an aligned observer there is already attenuation by a factor of 4.

Image2.jpg

where v is defined as
Image4.jpg

Image6.jpg


where in the case of the sundial we plug in d1 = infinity. Source: http://www.waves.utoronto.ca/prof/svhum/ece422/notes/19-diffraction.pdf

But what happens at v = 1 where diffused light is 14 dB or 25 times weaker? The v = 1 isosurface of d2-versus-h is actually parabolic, not flat (d2 = 2/wavelength * h^2). A bit of a surprise:

Image10.jpg


So putting the observer a long way from the edge does not spread light very much, h does not increase in proportion. At d2 = 10 metres, h is still just 2 millimeters for red light. The sun's transition with the sun's diameter of 0.5 degrees would be 87 mm wide at the same distance.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K