How are branching ratios determined? by experiment only?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WarpedWatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Ratios
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
WarpedWatch
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

when I look up how nuclear reactions take place, I often see branching ratios listed as percentages. So I'm wondering: are those ratios determined only by experiment or is there some fundamental theory that can predict what those percentages will be?

many thanks,
Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are studying a process X -> Y, the "rate" at which this process occurs is called [itex]\Gamma(X\rightarrow Y)[/itex]. This is computable. If we denote the TOTAL width (that is, the inverse lifetime, the sum of all possible decay widths for all possible Y, also computable) as [itex]\Gamma(X)[/itex], then a "branching ratio" is defined as:

[tex]\frac{\Gamma(X\rightarrow Y)}{\Gamma(X)}[/tex]

That is, it is the fraction of total decays of X that go into Y. So all this is computable, and it is always a fraction (percentage), since

[tex]\Gamma(X)=\sum_Y \Gamma(X\rightarrow Y)[/tex].

I'm not sure if that answers your question...

These things are all computable from quantum mechanics/quantum field theory.
 
blechman said:
...

These things are all computable from quantum mechanics/quantum field theory.

Yes, that is what I wanted to know. I was wondering if this kind of phenomenon is something that could have been figured out without running direct experiments.

many, many thanks for your help,
Mark
 
yes, one can calculate partial widths directly from Fermi's Golden Rule in Quantum Mechanics (and its relativistic generalizations in Quantum Field Theory) and compare to experiment.

Happy I was able to help!