How Are Cosets Related to Normal Subgroups?

  • Thread starter Thread starter walwaldoggy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets Normal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Cosets and normal subgroups are fundamentally interconnected in group theory. A normal subgroup is defined as a subgroup whose left cosets are also right cosets, establishing a key relationship between the two concepts. Furthermore, the cosets of a normal subgroup form a quotient group, illustrating how normal subgroups facilitate the partitioning of a group into distinct, manageable components. Understanding these relationships is crucial for deeper insights into group structure and behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of group theory concepts
  • Familiarity with the definitions of cosets
  • Knowledge of normal subgroups and their properties
  • Concept of quotient groups in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normal subgroups in detail
  • Explore the construction and significance of quotient groups
  • Investigate examples of cosets in various groups
  • Learn about the implications of the First Isomorphism Theorem
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the structural properties of groups and their subgroups.

walwaldoggy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys
I'm curious about how to interpret cosets and normal subgroups.
I do know the definitions of both, but I do not understand how they relate to each other.
A (left) coset is supposed to partition a group as well as normal subgroups, but I'm sure there is a more profound relationship between the two than just the similarity I have pointed out.

I'll look forward to your inputs!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're looking for. A normal subgroup is simply a subgroup who's left cosets are also right cosets. Also the cosets of a normal subgroup form a group themself: the quotient group.

There are certainly nice relationships between cosets and normal subgroups, but I'm not certain which ones you want. Maybe you can clarify?

Also, I'm not quite sure what you mean with "normal subgroups partition the group"...
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
565
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K