How are degrees of freedom understood in QM?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Degrees of freedom in Quantum Mechanics (QM) are defined as the number of independent parameters that define the state of a system. For a system of N particles, the degrees of freedom are quantified as 3N, corresponding to the three spatial coordinates for each particle. In contrast, a quantum field possesses an infinite number of degrees of freedom. The observer is conventionally considered external to the system and does not alter the degrees of freedom, although observations can change the specific state within the state space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with state space concepts
  • Knowledge of particle physics
  • Basic grasp of quantum fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of state space in Quantum Mechanics
  • Explore the implications of observation in quantum systems
  • Study the differences between classical and quantum degrees of freedom
  • Learn about quantum fields and their infinite degrees of freedom
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum theory and the role of observation in physical systems.

Posy McPostface
I'm having a hard time understanding 'degrees of freedom'. Could someone please provide an example in terms of Quantum Mechanics about what a 'degree of freedom' could be represented as? Is it simply a number of observations of a physical system to determine the arrangement of particles within that system? Does the accuracy increase with a number of observations made or is one observation enough?

On a deeper level, is there a demarcation that can be said about the observer and the state space of a system or does that line blur away once an observation is made?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a system of N particles, the number of degrees of freedom is 3N, one for each position coordinate of each particle. On the other hand, a quantum field has an infinite number of degreeess of freedom.

This is the most typical usage. In a generalized sense, one may consider other (e.g., spin) coordinates as degrees of freedom but this is far less common (and must be inferred from the context).

In any case, this has nothing to do with observation.

The observer is conventionally always assumed to be completely outside the observed system, and hence not represented in the latter's state space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
A. Neumaier said:
The observer is conventionally always assumed to be completely outside the observed system, and hence not represented in the latter's state space.
Thank you for the explanation. I understand now.

Doesn't the observer interact with the system by observing it and thus affecting the degrees of freedom in the new observer-state space?
 
Posy McPostface said:
Thank you for the explanation. I understand now.

Doesn't the observer interact with the system by observing it and thus affecting the degrees of freedom in the new observer-state space?
Observation doesn't change the degrees of freedom but only the particular state in the state space of the system.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K