MHB How are Earthquake Magnitudes Calculated on the Richter Scale?

arl2267
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The magnitude of an earthquake, measured on the Richter scale, is given by

R(I)= log(I/I0)

Where I is the amplitude registered on a seismograph located 100km from the epicenter of the earthquake, and I0 is the amplitude of a certain small size earthquake. Find the Richter scale ratings of earthquakes with the following amplitudes:

a) 1,000,000I0

b) 1,000,000,000I0

Okay so would the solution be

log(100/1,000,000)= -4

log(100/1,000,000,000)= -6

?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
arl2267 said:
The magnitude of an earthquake, measured on the Richter scale, is given by

R(I)= log(I/I0)

Where I is the amplitude registered on a seismograph located 100km from the epicenter of the earthquake, and I0 is the amplitude of a certain small size earthquake. Find the Richter scale ratings of earthquakes with the following amplitudes:

a) 1,000,000I0

b) 1,000,000,000I0

Okay so would the solution be

log(100/1,000,000)= -4

log(100/1,000,000,000)= -6

?

The value of 100km is meaningless in this context - ignore it. The question is giving you values of $I$ in terms of $I_0$ which means the latter will cancel out giving a number.

Your values should be positive. If you consider it logically an earthquake 1 million times stronger than a reference will be larger on the Richter scale than said reference quake.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top