MHB How are Earthquake Magnitudes Calculated on the Richter Scale?

AI Thread Summary
The Richter scale calculates earthquake magnitudes using the formula R(I) = log(I/I0), where I is the amplitude recorded on a seismograph and I0 is a reference amplitude. For amplitudes of 1,000,000I0 and 1,000,000,000I0, the correct calculations yield positive values, indicating stronger earthquakes. The initial suggestion of negative values was incorrect, as the scale measures relative strength, not absolute amplitude. The 100km distance mentioned is irrelevant for the calculation since I0 cancels out. Understanding the logarithmic nature of the scale is crucial for accurate magnitude assessment.
arl2267
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The magnitude of an earthquake, measured on the Richter scale, is given by

R(I)= log(I/I0)

Where I is the amplitude registered on a seismograph located 100km from the epicenter of the earthquake, and I0 is the amplitude of a certain small size earthquake. Find the Richter scale ratings of earthquakes with the following amplitudes:

a) 1,000,000I0

b) 1,000,000,000I0

Okay so would the solution be

log(100/1,000,000)= -4

log(100/1,000,000,000)= -6

?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
arl2267 said:
The magnitude of an earthquake, measured on the Richter scale, is given by

R(I)= log(I/I0)

Where I is the amplitude registered on a seismograph located 100km from the epicenter of the earthquake, and I0 is the amplitude of a certain small size earthquake. Find the Richter scale ratings of earthquakes with the following amplitudes:

a) 1,000,000I0

b) 1,000,000,000I0

Okay so would the solution be

log(100/1,000,000)= -4

log(100/1,000,000,000)= -6

?

The value of 100km is meaningless in this context - ignore it. The question is giving you values of $I$ in terms of $I_0$ which means the latter will cancel out giving a number.

Your values should be positive. If you consider it logically an earthquake 1 million times stronger than a reference will be larger on the Richter scale than said reference quake.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top