How Are Friction and Angular Velocity Related in the Cube on Funnel Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed Farhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between friction and angular velocity in the context of a cube placed on a funnel. Participants explore the forces acting on the cube, including weight, normal force, centripetal force, and frictional force, while questioning how these forces interact under different conditions of angular velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the direction of the frictional force and its dependence on angular velocity (ω), questioning whether it acts up or down the incline. They explore scenarios of the funnel's rotation speed and its effects on the cube's movement.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the relationship between friction and angular velocity, with participants offering insights into the conditions under which friction acts in different directions. Some participants express confusion about the implications of varying ω and the resulting forces, while others provide clarifications regarding the forces in play.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves understanding the balance of forces on the cube, particularly under conditions of static and dynamic friction, and the implications of angular acceleration on the system. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by varying the speed of the funnel.

Ahmed Farhan
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
518.jpg

I've uploaded a picture instead of writing the whole problem.
So the forces to consider here are - the weight of the cube, the normal force exerted on it by the funnel surface in contact, the centripetal force, and the frictional force.
If there is no relative motion between the cube and the funnel, then the net force must be the centripetal force. But I can't write out the force equations unless I know whether the frictional force points up the incline or down. I'm guessing it has something to do with ω but I can't be sure and I can't find the right logic.
I want to know if my assumptions are right and if they are, how are the friction and ω related ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahmed Farhan said:
View attachment 211204
I've uploaded a picture instead of writing the whole problem.
So the forces to consider here are - the weight of the cube, the normal force exerted on it by the funnel surface in contact, the centripetal force, and the frictional force.
If there is no relative motion between the cube and the funnel, then the net force must be the centripetal force. But I can't write out the force equations unless I know whether the frictional force points up the incline or down. I'm guessing it has something to do with ω but I can't be sure and I can't find the right logic.
I want to know if my assumptions are right and if they are, how are the friction and ω related ?
The force of friction can point both up and down the incline. Accordingly, you can get a maximum and a minimum value of ω..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan
ehild said:
The force of friction can point both up and down the incline. Accordingly, you can get a maximum and a minimum value of ω..
Thank you for your answer. But what I was trying to understand is if the frictional force points up the incline, why? And if the opposite is true, I want to know the reason too. I simply don't understand the relation between maximum and minimum value of ω and the direction of friction.
 
Ahmed Farhan said:
Thank you for your answer. But what I was trying to understand is if the frictional force points up the incline, why? And if the opposite is true, I want to know the reason too. I simply don't understand the relation between maximum and minimum value of ω and the direction of friction.
Other than friction, the only forces acting are gravity and the normal force. To maintain position on the funnel, the resultant force needed is centripetal, so radial. Those three are all in the one plane. Since friction acts to oppose relative motion, there is no cause for the frictional force to act out of that plane. Thus it must be directly up or down the funnel.
If ω were not constant then there would be tangential component to the friction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan
Ahmed Farhan said:
Thank you for your answer. But what I was trying to understand is if the frictional force points up the incline, why? And if the opposite is true, I want to know the reason too. I simply don't understand the relation between maximum and minimum value of ω and the direction of friction.
Assume the friction is not too high and ω=0, so the funnel is in rest. How does the cube move?
What happens when the funnel rotates very fast?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan
ehild said:
Assume the friction is not too high and ω=0, so the funnel is in rest. How does the cube move?
What happens when the funnel rotates very fast?
So I came to the conclusion after thinking over your suggestion that the friction should point up the incline if ω is small and down the incline if it's large. Is my conclusion correct?
 
haruspex said:
Other than friction, the only forces acting are gravity and the normal force. To maintain position on the funnel, the resultant force needed is centripetal, so radial. Those three are all in the one plane. Since friction acts to oppose relative motion, there is no cause for the frictional force to act out of that plane. Thus it must be directly up or down the funnel.
If ω were not constant then there would be tangential component to the friction.
It's becoming clearer to me now but I'm still a bit confused. if ω weren't constant, why would friction have tangential component? And are you implying there's relative motion up or down the incline? Hope this isn't a silly question.
 
Ahmed Farhan said:
So I came to the conclusion after thinking over your suggestion that the friction should point up the incline if ω is small and down the incline if it's large. Is my conclusion correct?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan
Ahmed Farhan said:
if ω weren't constant, why would friction have tangential component?
Because there would be tangential acceleration of the funnel. For the cube to move with it, there would have to be a tangential force on the cube.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan
  • #10
Ahmed Farhan said:
It's becoming clearer to me now but I'm still a bit confused. if ω weren't constant, why would friction have tangential component? And are you implying there's relative motion up or down the incline? Hope this isn't a silly question.
If ω isn't constant, the speed of the block is changing. The radial acceleration, being perpendicular to the motion, can't be the cause; it can only change the direction of the block's movement. There has to be a tangential acceleration parallel to the block's velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan
  • #11
@Ahmed Farhan. Welcome to PF.

Two perpendicular forces act on the mass, m, of the cube, one is radial, due to m and ω, the other vertical due to m and gravity. What is the vector sum of those two forces? What is the direction of that vector? What is the direction of that vector relative to the funnel surface? How does that angle relate to the variable ω ?

Friction acts in the plane of the contact surface. The force on the cube must be resolved into two parts. One component of that force acts normal to the friction surface, it presses the cube onto that surface. The other component acts parallel with the surface. The cube will slide along the friction surface when the parallel component is sufficient to overcome friction.

A coefficient of friction is the ratio of two perpendicular force components.
Do you understand why, and can you explain the importance of; angle = ArcTangent( ratio of forces )?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed Farhan

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K