How Are Isospin Values Determined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeebs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isospin
jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
I'm having a little bit of trouble with isospin. What I have gathered so far is that say, for the proton and neutron, apart from their charge they are very similar, so they are considered to be different states of the same particle called the nucleon.

So, we say the nucleon has an isospin of I=1/2, and the proton has third component I3=+1/2, and the neutron has third component I3=-1/2, right? And we say the proton and neutron form the nucleon multiplet, right?

Also, there are other multiplets like the pions. the pion multiplet (which has I=1) consists of \pi^+,\pi^0 and \pi^-, which have I3=+1, 0 and -1 respectively.

What I don't get is where these numbers actually come from. How have the values for I assigned to each multiplet been worked out?

And am I right in thinking that the I3 values are arbitrary, for example, there was no reason to give protons an I3 value of +1/2 instead of -1/2, its just something that was decided on?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The isospin values are chosen to give the correct number of states.

Eg., "proton" and "neutron" are 2 states. We know that a spin=1/2 particle also has two states, +1/2 and -1/2. So we use I=1/2 for the isospin.

Similarly for the pion system and a spin=1 particle, which both have 3 possible states.

And am I right in thinking that the I3 values are arbitrary, for example, there was no reason to give protons an I3 value of +1/2 instead of -1/2, its just something that was decided on?
I suspect that is the case. It may be the convention to rank particles according to charge when assigning I3 values.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top