How are Stereographic Projections Derived in Differential Geometry?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of stereographic projections in the context of differential geometry, specifically focusing on the mathematical relationships between points on a sphere and their corresponding projections onto a plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions and geometric interpretations of stereographic projection, with one asking for clarification on the term 'project' and another seeking initial steps in the proof.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the geometric setup and the equations involved, while others are attempting to engage with the derivation process. There is an ongoing exploration of the steps needed to understand the projection and its inverse.

Contextual Notes

One participant expresses uncertainty about the definitions and seeks further clarification, indicating a potential gap in foundational understanding that may affect the discussion.

niall14
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In cartesian coordinates (x.y,z) on the and (X,Y) on the plane, the projection and its inverse are given by the following formulae:

(X,Y)=(x/1-z,y/1-z)

(x,y,z)=(2X/1+X^2+Y^2, 2Y/1+X^2+Y^2, -1+X^2+Y^2/1+X^2 +Y^2)

This relates to the field of differential geo.Anybody have a proof to where thes equations are derived?

Thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivation is straightforward if not somewhat cumbersome. Do you know how stereographic projection is defined? You take the straightline through a pole and a point on the sphere and project it onto the plane. Consider a fixed point on the sphere (x,y,z) and find the line through the North pole and (x,y,z). Then find where it intersects the plane z=0.
 
thanks for your reply.not really to sure what u mean by 'project'.if you could give me the first few lines of the proof I am sure i could figure it out.
 
I'll give you one direction, the other follows similarly but is definitely the harder direction. Consider the north pole [itex](0,0,1)[/itex] and let [itex](x_0,y_0,z_0)[/itex] be a point on the sphere. Then the line between the north pole and this point is given by
[tex]x = x_0 t, \qquad y = y_0 t, \qquad z = 1 + (z_0 - 1)t[/tex]
which is easily calculated via basic geometric results. Notice that when [itex]t=0[/itex] we get the North pole, and when [itex]t = 1[/itex] we get the point on the sphere. Now we want to calculate where this line hits the z=0 plane, so in particular
[tex]z= 0 = 1+(z_0 - 1)t \quad \Rightarrow t = \frac1{1-z_0}[/tex]
Substituting this value into the equation of the line we get the intersection of the line with the plane
[tex]\left( \frac{x_0}{1-z_0}, \frac{y_0}{1-z_0}, 0 \right)[/tex]
and we drop the third coordinate since we want to identify the sphere with the plane.

Again, the other direction is a bit harder and more technical, but follows precisely the same idea. Give it a try yourself and see if you can get the right answer.
 
thanks ill give it a go
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K