How Can Derivatives Determine Speed in Physics Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving the relationship between acceleration and velocity, specifically using the equation \( a = 1.5 \sqrt{v} \). Participants guide the original poster through the process of rewriting the equation in differential form, integrating, and addressing computational errors that led to an incorrect velocity of 0.023 m/s instead of the correct answer of 22.4 m/s. The importance of using LaTeX for clarity in mathematical expressions is also emphasized, along with the correct handling of units in the context of dimensional analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus, particularly integration and differentiation.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of acceleration and velocity in physics.
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations.
  • Basic principles of dimensional analysis in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply integration techniques to solve differential equations in physics.
  • Study the principles of dimensional analysis to ensure unit consistency in equations.
  • Explore the use of LaTeX for presenting mathematical work clearly and effectively.
  • Investigate the relationship between acceleration and velocity in various physical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, mathematicians dealing with calculus, and anyone interested in improving their problem-solving skills in physics-related topics.

emily-
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The acceleration of the boat is defined by
a = (1.5 v^(1/2)) m/s. Determine its speed when t = 4 s if it has
a speed of 3 m/s when t = 0.
Relevant Equations
v = ds/dt
a = dv/dt
a ds = v dv
I have been trying to solve this problem for hours using the mentioned equations but no matter what I do I cannot get the correct answer, that is v = 22.4 m/s. I thought that maybe if I could get an expression where v is a function of time I could solve the problem but I don't know how to do that since they always end up being separate. Any help and guidance would be deeply appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of your "relevant equations" is capable of solving your issue. You are given:

$$ a = 1.5 \sqrt{v} $$

Which one do you think it is?
 
erobz said:
One of your "relevant equations" is capable of solving your issue. You are given:

$$ a = 1.5 \sqrt{v} $$

Which one do you think it is?
a = dv/dt
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Yes, sub in the differential form for ##a##, separate variables and integrate each side.
 
erobz said:
Yes, sub in the differential form for ##a##, separate variables and integrate each side.
I rewrote the equation to: dt = dv/a and then integrated both sides. When it comes to the boundaries, I wrote 4 <- 0 for dt and v <- 3 for dv/a but as a result I got 0.023 m/s
 
You're having some computational error. I get ##22.4 ~\rm{m/s}## when I do it. Please show your work using Latex. See: LaTeX Guide
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: emily-
emily- said:
then integrated both sides
Show us the steps
 
Integral of dt = 4
Integral of dv/a = 2/3√v - 2/3√3
I move the numerical expressions to one side and isolate √v and square it
 
erobz said:
You're having some computational error. I get ##22.4 ~\rm{m/s}## when I do it. Please show your work using Latex. See: LaTeX Guide
BvU said:
Show us the steps
I got the integral expression wrong!! It's (2√v)/1.5 and not 2/3√v ! Omg
Thanks for the help!!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #10
emily- said:
Integral of dv/a = 2/3√v - 2/3√3
Nope ! What is the integral of ##{2\over 3} {dv\over\sqrt v} ## ?
 
  • #11
emily- said:
I rewrote the equation to: dt = dv/a and then integrated both sides. When it comes to the boundaries, I wrote 4 <- 0 for dt and v <- 3 for dv/a but as a result I got 0.023 m/s
Please show you work. I suspect you made a mistake when you integrated. Consider using LaTeX to post your equations. It makes them more legible and it's a good skill to have. Click on the link "LaTeX Guide", lower left to see how it is done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: emily-
  • #12
BvU said:
Nope ! What is the integral of ##{2\over 3} {dv\over\sqrt v} ## ?
It should be (4√v)/3 right?
 
  • #13
Yes. So you get ##\sqrt {v(t)}-\sqrt{v(0)} = {3\over 4} t##. Move to the other side and square.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: emily-
  • #14
BvU said:
Yes. So you get ##\sqrt {v(t)}-\sqrt{v(0)} = {3\over 4} t##. Move to the other side and square.
Yess, thanks!!
 
  • #15
You are welcome. And ##\LaTeX## really is fun !

(:smile: sorry for intruding, @erobz)

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: emily-
  • #16
BvU said:
(:smile: sorry for intruding, @erobz)

##\ ##
Don't be!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #17
The issue has been solved, but …
emily- said:
a = (1.5 v^(1/2)) m/s.
… this cannot be true! The units are all over the place!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and erobz
  • #18
Orodruin said:
The issue has been solved, but …

… this cannot be true! The units are all over the place!
Right. Should be ##(1.5 v^{\frac 12}) m^{\frac 12}s^{-\frac 32}##, yes?
 
  • #19
haruspex said:
Right. Should be ##(1.5 v^{\frac 12}) m^{\frac 12}s^{-\frac 32}##, yes?
Yes, if ##v## is dimensionful with the appropriate units. However, sometimes you see introductory texts introduce dimensionless quantities such as "velocity is ##v## m/s", making ##v## actually dimensionless. This looks like some strange combination, but that's how I would do it (although I would probably write it as ##(1.5~{\rm m}^{1/2}/{\rm s}^{3/2}) \sqrt{v}## or - even better - ##k\sqrt v##, where ##k = 1.5~{\rm m}^{1/2}/{\rm s}^{3/2}##).

If one wants to use dimensionless quantities here, I would have formulated it just like "##a = 1.5\sqrt{v}##, where the acceleration is ##a## m/s2 and the velocity is ##v## m/s".
 
  • #20
Orodruin said:
Yes, if v is dimensionful with the appropriate units.
Aren't the units of v irrelevant to the correct form (as long as it has the dimension of velocity)?
 
  • #21
haruspex said:
Aren't the units of v irrelevant to the correct form (as long as it has the dimension of velocity)?
Sure. With ”suitable” I only mean ”of the correct dimensions”.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
677
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
990
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K