How can frequency be used to calculate refractive index?

Click For Summary
To calculate the refractive index using only the frequency of light entering a medium from air, additional information is needed, such as the speed of light in that medium. The refractive index is defined as the speed of light in a vacuum divided by the speed of light in the medium. Without a formula that relates refractive index to frequency or wavelength, it is impossible to determine the refractive index solely from frequency. The discussion highlights the complexity introduced by dispersion and absorption, which can lead to a complex index of refraction. Ultimately, knowing just the frequency does not provide enough data to calculate the refractive index accurately.
Francy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can i calculate the refractive index knowing only the frequency of the light entering the medium from air?

n(refractive index) = (speed of light in vacuum) / (speed of light in medium)
 
Science news on Phys.org
You can't, unless you are provided with a formula for the refractive index in terms of frequency or wavelength.

p.s. Welcome to Physics Forums.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I think the problem I have here doesn't have all the information. Thanks anyway! Thanks also for welcoming me here ^^
 
I believe that for real indexes of refraction, Re (n(λ)) = c/v(λ).

If the index of refraction varies with wavelength (dispersion), then there is absorption as well as dispersion, which is equivalent to a complex index of refraction. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index
See in particular the section on Complex index of refraction and absorption.
 
Bob S said:
I believe that for real indexes of refraction, Re (n(λ)) = c/v(λ).
But in this situation we don't have v(λ), we only have the frequency \nu. From that we can get λ in air, but not λ in the medium or v(λ) for that matter.
 
Redbelly98 said:
But in this situation we don't have v(λ), we only have the frequency \nu. From that we can get λ in air, but not λ in the medium or v(λ) for that matter.
I should have said for ANY n(λ), the velocity v(λ) = c/Re (n(λ))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K