How Can Gearbox Friction Be Engineered to Fail at Specific Load Weights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beattie_03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around engineering gearbox friction to fail at specific load weights for a balsa wood crane project. Participants explore the mechanics of gearbox friction, motor torque, and the implications for load management in an electro-mechanical system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Sean proposes utilizing gearbox friction to hold a 1kg load while allowing it to fail at 1.5kg when the motor is not running.
  • One participant explains that a gearbox functions as a torque transformer and that the torque on a stalled output shaft is proportional to the motor current.
  • Sean seeks clarification on calculating the friction in the gearbox to resist a specific load when the motor is off.
  • Another participant states that accurately predicting friction in a normal gearbox is challenging due to its dependence on factors like temperature and lubrication, suggesting that a worm drive could achieve the desired friction lock.
  • This participant also mentions that limiting the stall current of a DC motor can control its ability to lift specific weights, allowing it to lift 1kg but not 1.5kg.
  • There is a suggestion to use a small wiper motor with a worm drive from an old vehicle, proposing modifications to enhance functionality.
  • Another participant briefly mentions the use of a power screw and suggests looking up relevant equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and methods of achieving the desired gearbox friction characteristics, indicating that multiple competing approaches and uncertainties remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in predicting gearbox friction due to various factors, and there are unresolved aspects regarding the calculations needed for the motor and gearbox interactions.

beattie_03
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I have an engineering project where I need to be a able to lift a 1kg load with a balsa wood crane, but have it fail at 1.5kg so as to be not over engineered.

Various components need to fail (eg truss, which is easy) but I am trying to work out how to get the electro-mechanical component to fail.

One of my ideas was to utilise the friction in the gearbox to hold the weight of the 1kg load when the motor is not running, but when there is a 1.5kg load and the motor stops running, the friction in the gears will not be strong enough and the gears will slip into reverse and drop the load.

I have gauged that this is possible, but am getting a bit confused with Holding/Stall torque and if I should be calculating this for the motor or gearbox or both.

Any guidance?

Cheers! Sean.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A gearbox is a mechanical torque transformer.
If you use a DC motor then the torque on the stalled output shaft will be proportional to the motor current.
 
Sorry could you explain further. Essentially (I Think) I want the friction in the gearbox to resist a certain load when the motor is not running. I am trying to work out how to calculate this?
 
There is no way to accurately predict the friction through a normal gearbox. It is an exponential problem highly dependent on temperature and lubrication. Only with a worm drive could friction lock the gearbox when without motor power.

If you limit the stall current to a DC motor it will fail to lift 1.5kg, but it will still be able to lift 1.0kg. That can be very accurately controlled.

If you can get a small wiper motor out of an old 12V vehicle. They often have a 12V motor with a worm driving an external crank. Consider removing the crank and replacing it with a drum.
 
the only thing you can take Is a power screw. you can find the equation for all
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
25K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K