How can I adjust the index in summation notation for the Frobenius method?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Somefantastik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Summation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on adjusting the index in summation notation for the Frobenius method, specifically the expression \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}(k+r)(k+r-1)x^{k-1}. The user aims to transform the x term to the form x^n by setting n = k-1, but encounters an issue with the index starting at n = -1, which is deemed nonsensical in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining valid indices in mathematical expressions, particularly when applying the Frobenius method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of summation notation
  • Familiarity with the Frobenius method
  • Basic knowledge of index manipulation in mathematical expressions
  • Concept of valid indices in series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of index shifts in series expansions
  • Study the Frobenius method in detail, focusing on its application in differential equations
  • Learn about valid index ranges in summation notation
  • Explore examples of index adjustments in mathematical series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential equations, and anyone interested in the Frobenius method and series manipulation.

Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}(k+r)(k+r-1)x^{k-1}

I need to get my x term to look like xn.

If I set n = k-1, then that makes my index start at n = -1, which is silly. What can I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is that silly? When k = 0, you have x^-1 in your original summation.
 
It doesn't make sense when I'm using it in the Frobenius method.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K