How Can I Apply the Squeeze Theorem Without Trig Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TitoSmooth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Squeeze Theorem to limits involving non-trigonometric functions. A user seeks clarification on bounding the function x^2 + 1 as x approaches 0, noting the challenge compared to trigonometric examples. It is explained that for the limit of x^2 + 1, one only needs to find bounding functions within a specific interval, such as [-1, 1]. The key takeaway is that bounding does not need to apply to all values of x, just those near the point of interest. Understanding this concept allows for the application of the Squeeze Theorem in non-trig scenarios effectively.
TitoSmooth
Messages
158
Reaction score
6
Not sure how to apply the Squeeze Theorem when not given in trig functions.

My question is.

Lim (x^2+1)=1
x→0

not sure what values let's call them K. ie -K≤x^2+≤K.

for instances when I have.

Lim xsin(1/x)=0
x→0

i say. -1≤sin(1/x)≤1

then multiply the whole inequality by x.

-x≤xsin(1/x)≤x

therefore limit as x approaches 0 of sin(1/x)=0


how would I do it for for non trig functions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi TitoSmooth! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

You probably wouldn't need it for non-trig (or non-algebraic) functions!

For example, there's no way of applying it to x2+1.

wikipedia has an example, involving two variables:

-|y| ≤ x2y/(x2 + y2) ≤ |y|​
 
tiny-tim said:
For example, there's no way of applying it to x2+1.
Yes, there is. There are two very simple functions which bound 1+x2 from above and from below on the interval [-1,1]. The key is that you only need to concern yourself with an interval containing x=0. You don't have to find a simple function that bounds 1+x2 from above for all x.
 
vela said:
Yes, there is. There are two very simple functions which bound 1+x2 from above and from below on the interval [-1,1]. The key is that you only need to concern yourself with an interval containing x=0. You don't have to find a simple function that bounds 1+x2 from above for all x.


Layman terms my man. So I could understand better. Thanks
 
Layman terms? I can see no technical terms in what Vela wrote, except possibly "interval" and vela defined it: "the interval [-1, 1]".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Layman terms? I can see no technical terms in what Vela wrote, except possibly "interval" and vela defined it: "the interval [-1, 1]".

You don't have to find a simple function that bounds 1+x2 from above for all x.


missread this. I understand now between the closed interval of -1 and 1
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K