How Can I Correctly Apply Induction to Solve My Discrete Math Homework?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying mathematical induction to a discrete math problem. The original poster seeks assistance specifically with the induction step of their proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the original poster's attempts at the induction step, with one noting a potential issue in using the hypothesis within the proof. Others suggest clarifying the structure of the argument and emphasize the importance of presenting a coherent mathematical argument rather than just formulas.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's attempts and encouraging a more structured approach to the induction proof. There is no explicit consensus, but guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of the argument.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the proof structure and the rules of mathematical induction, with some questioning the appropriateness of certain assumptions made in the original poster's reasoning.

phenom01
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



20za978.png


Homework Equations



I need to prove this by using induction. I need help with the induction step.

The Attempt at a Solution

.

Basis step: let n=0; 2^0 = 2^(0+1) - 1 -----> 1=1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, what did you try for the induction step?
 
micromass said:
So, what did you try for the induction step?

i tried sum(2^k+1) = 2^n+1 + sum(2^k)

sum(2^k) = (2^n+1) -1 by our inductive hypothesis

(2^n+1)-1 + 2^n+1

2^n+1 + 2^n+1 = 2^n+2 which gives (2^n+2)-1

I think this is wrong
 
phenom01 said:
i tried sum(2^k+1) = 2^n+1 + sum(2^k)

sum(2^k) = (2^n+1) -1 by our inductive hypothesis

You can't use what you're trying to prove inside your proof.

Try starting out let this: suppose God has told you that the hypothesis holds for n-1. Based off this assumption, can you prove that it also holds for n?

That's your induction step.
 
It's not exactly wrong in fact you seem to have got more or less the right result, but you have set out a series of formulas and math is not a series of formulas, even when they're the right formulas, it's an argument.

Once you start the formulas you haven't mentioned sum and k any more.

Look up in your textbook how an induction argument is set out and do it the same way rather rigidly and it should work (the algebraic formula calculation part of it is quite simple).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K