How can I describe geometrically the transformation ACA-1 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natasha1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
If A represents the matrix of a rotation of 45 degrees anti-clockwise around (0,0), B a shear with x-axis invariant and shear factor of 2, and C a reflection in the x-axis.

How can I describe geometrically the transformation ACA-1 ?

My answer is a rotation of 90 degrees anti-clockwise around (0,0) but surely there is more than that? :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Natasha1 said:
If A represents the matrix of a rotation of 45 degrees anti-clockwise around (0,0), B a shear with x-axis invariant and shear factor of 2, and C a reflection in the x-axis.

How can I describe geometrically the transformation ACA-1 ?

My answer is a rotation of 90 degrees anti-clockwise around (0,0) but surely there is more than that? :frown:

There is no B in this problem? Think about what happens to the unit vectors in the x and y directions. Since A corresponds to a 45 degree rotation anti-clockwise, A-1 corresponds to its opposite, a 45 degree rotation clockwise. The vector i is changed by A-1 to the vector [itex]\frac{sqrt{2}}{2}(i- j)[/itex], then by C to [itex]\frac{sqrt{2}}{2}(i+ j)[itex], then by A to j. Okay, that's been rotated 90 anti-clockwise. The vector j is changed by A<sup>-1</sup> to [itex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(i+ j)[\itex], then by C to [itex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(i- j)[/itex] and finally by A to i. No, that's <b>not</b> a rotation by 90 degrees anti-clockwise! It is a reflection about what line?[/itex][/itex][/itex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
There is no B in this problem? Think about what happens to the unit vectors in the x and y directions. Since A corresponds to a 45 degree rotation anti-clockwise, A-1 corresponds to its opposite, a 45 degree rotation clockwise. The vector i is changed by A-1 to the vector [itex]\frac{sqrt{2}}{2}(i- j)[/itex], then by C to [itex]\frac{sqrt{2}}{2}(i+ j)[itex], then by A to j. Okay, that's been rotated 90 anti-clockwise. The vector j is changed by A<sup>-1</sup> to [itex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(i+ j)[\itex], then by C to [itex]\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}(i- j)[/itex] and finally by A to i. No, that's <b>not</b> a rotation by 90 degrees anti-clockwise! It is a reflection about what line?[/itex][/itex][/itex]
[itex][itex][itex] <br /> line y = x <img src="https://www.physicsforums.com/styles/physicsforums/xenforo/smilies/oldschool/redface.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":redface:" title="Red Face :redface:" data-shortname=":redface:" />[/itex][/itex][/itex]
 
That done I need to show that if P' is the image of P under D=BCB-1. If P is not on the x-axis, then PP' is bisected by the x-axis and is at a constant angle to the x-axis, for any choice of P?

I can visually see what's happening and can see that the angle is 90 degrees but how can I show it? :rolleyes:
 
Could anyone help me with the last question? Please:cry: