How can I eliminate phi and u to derive the Compton effect equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the Compton effect equation, specifically focusing on the elimination of variables phi and u from the relevant equations. Participants are engaging with concepts from quantum mechanics and relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate momentum and energy conservation equations to eliminate variables. Some participants suggest alternative methods involving 4-momentum conservation, while others focus on algebraic manipulation to simplify the equations. There is a specific emphasis on the order of elimination as stated in the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to the problem, with some providing links to external resources and others questioning the rationale behind the prescribed method of elimination. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but various lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

The problem explicitly instructs participants to eliminate "phi" before "u," which is a point of contention among some participants. The complexity of the algebraic manipulation is noted as a challenge in progressing towards the solution.

b2386
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Right now, I am working on a homework problem asking me to derive the Compton effect, which is given by [tex]\lambda\prime-\lambda=\frac{h}{m_ec}(1-cos\theta)[/tex]

A diagram of the situation can be found here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/compton.html#c1 (However, in my diagram, the recoil electron and scattered photon are switched with the electron and [tex]\phi[/tex] below the x-axis and the photon and [tex]\theta[/tex] above the x axis.)

To derive the equation, I use the momentum conservation equations and energy conservation equation.

There are two equations for the momentum, one for the x component and one for the y component:

x-component: [tex]\frac{h}{\lambda}=\frac{h}{\lambda\prime}cos\theta+\gamma m u cos\phi[/tex]

y-component: [tex]0=\frac{h}{\lambda\prime}sin\theta-\gamma mu sin\phi[/tex]

where [tex]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
m=electron mass
u=electron velocity after the collision

My equation for energy conservation is:

[tex]h\frac{c}{\lambda}+mc^2=h\frac{c}{\lambda\prime}+\gamma m c^2[/tex]


To start off, I solved the x component of the momentum for cos(phi) and the y component for sin(phi). I then added the equations together and got (since sin^2 + cos^2 = 1):

[tex]\frac{h^2}{\lambda\prime^2\gamma^2m^2u^2}+\frac{h^2}{\lambda^2\gamma^2m^2u^2}-\frac{2h^2cos\theta}{\lambda\prime\lambda\gamma^2m^2u^2}=1[/tex]

At this point, I am to now eliminate u using the resulting equation and the equation for the energy conservation as given above. However, I am stuck on this next step because it seems as though any algabraic manipulation I try makes the equation extremely complicated. Could anyone please give me some hints as to what step should be next?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The easy way to do it is (in natural units):
1. Conservation of 4-momentum is k-k'=p'-p, where p=(m;0).
2. Square each 4-vector, getting 2kk'(1-cos)=2mE'-2m^2.
3. Conservation of energy is E'-m=k-k', so kk'(1-cos)=m(k-k').
4. Divide by kk' and use lambda=2pi/k. Put in hbar/c if you want.
 
Thanks for your replies. However, in the problem wording, it specifically tells us to start by eliminating "phi" first and then eliminate "u" from the 3equations. I have a hunch that this will be accomplished by substituting

in [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}[/tex] for [tex]\gamma[/tex]. This eliminates gamma and also results in more "u"s, which may allow me to cancel them out. It's just getting to that point that is the problem.
 
b2386 said:
Thanks for your replies. However, in the problem wording, it specifically tells us to start by eliminating "phi" first and then eliminate "u" from the 3equations. I have a hunch that this will be accomplished by substituting

in [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}[/tex] for [tex]\gamma[/tex]. This eliminates gamma and also results in more "u"s, which may allow me to cancel them out. It's just getting to that point that is the problem.
The link I posted outlines the approach that will get you there. The key is to express the electron energy in terms of its momentum and rest energy instead of the representation you used. Solve your last equation and the energy equation for momentum squared and set them equal. With a bit of Algebra many terms will cancel and you will have the result.
 
Last edited:
b2386 said:
Thanks for your replies. However, in the problem wording, it specifically tells us to start by eliminating "phi" first and then eliminate "u" from the 3equations.
Who would tell you to do it that way?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K