How can I evaluate the Bose-Einstein integral for black body radiation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral J = ∫₀^∞ (x³ / (e^x - 1)) dx evaluates to π⁴ / 15, a result derived from the study of black body radiation. The discussion highlights methods for evaluating this integral, including series expansions and substitutions. Key techniques involve using Taylor series for small x values and the Dirichlet eta function for convergence. The final result confirms the relationship between radiation energy density and temperature, p[rad] ~ T⁴.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically improper integrals.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their applications in approximating functions.
  • Knowledge of the Dirichlet eta function and its relation to gamma functions.
  • Basic concepts of black body radiation and its mathematical modeling.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Dirichlet eta function.
  • Learn about gamma functions and their role in integral evaluations.
  • Explore advanced techniques in series expansions for integrals.
  • Investigate the physical implications of black body radiation in thermodynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical physics, will benefit from this discussion. Additionally, mathematicians interested in integral calculus and series expansions will find the insights valuable.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465

Homework Statement



I am trying to evuluate the value of the integral:
J= \int_{0}^{∞} \frac{x^{3}}{e^{x}-1}dx

Could you please supply me with the method used for that? I thought of breaking the integral from 0 to 1 and from 1 to infinity. That way I could expand the exponential to taylor series for the small values of x, while the second would drop the 1 from the denominator, so it would be like exp[-x]x^3...(am I correct in the idea?).. However with that idea I'm left with a singularity at point 0. Would that mean I need to expand to Laurent series?
(it's not "really" homework, I am just playing around with black body radiation and radiation energy density to show that p[rad]~T^4 which we were given in class).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There should be no singularity at x=0, as the numerator goes to 0 faster than the denominator. I don't see how you get exp[-x]x^3.
 
Hmm Let me write it in formula:
\int_{0}^{∞} \frac{x^3}{e^{x}-1} dx= \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^3}{e^{x}-1} dx+\int_{1}^{∞} \frac{x^3}{e^{x}-1} dx
so here I'm saying that the first integrand has a singular point at x=0 because the denominator vanishes... Of course you are right about it going slower to 0 for the nominator (I got confused by thinking that exp is a faster function that any power but I lost it hehe). In fact I would expand the exponential to taylor series:
e^{x} ≈1+x and solve to get
\int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^3}{x}dx= \frac{x^{3}}{3}|^{1}_{0}=1/3
then I would try to say that the 2nd integrand, for x>1 the denominator is dominated by the exponential rather than the "-1" term... Or in other words I would write:
\int_{1}^{∞} \frac{x^3}{e^{x}-1} dx =\int_{1}^{∞} \frac{x^3}{e^{x}} dx=\int_{1}^{∞} e^{-x}x^3 dx

Unfortunately I don't think that this approach can give me the correct result, since the correct result needs π factors... probably numerically I might be close to the correct answer, since I guess it is a game of approximations I use, against a strict result (?)
 
Last edited:
ChrisVer said:

Homework Statement



I am trying to evuluate the value of the integral:
J= \int_{0}^{∞} \frac{x^{3}}{e^{x}-1}dx

Could you please supply me with the method used for that? I thought of breaking the integral from 0 to 1 and from 1 to infinity. That way I could expand the exponential to taylor series for the small values of x, while the second would drop the 1 from the denominator, so it would be like exp[-x]x^3...(am I correct in the idea?).. However with that idea I'm left with a singularity at point 0. Would that mean I need to expand to Laurent series?
(it's not "really" homework, I am just playing around with black body radiation and radiation energy density to show that p[rad]~T^4 which we were given in class).

Write
f(x) = \frac{x^3}{e^x-1} = x^3 e^{-x} \frac{1}{1 - e^{-x}}<br /> = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x^3 e^{-nx}
Integrate term-by-term. You will get an infinite series with a known sum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ChrisVer said:

Homework Statement



I am trying to evuluate the value of the integral:
J= \int_{0}^{∞} \frac{x^{3}}{e^{x}-1}dx

Could you please supply me with the method used for that? I thought of breaking the integral from 0 to 1 and from 1 to infinity. That way I could expand the exponential to taylor series for the small values of x, while the second would drop the 1 from the denominator, so it would be like exp[-x]x^3...(am I correct in the idea?).. However with that idea I'm left with a singularity at point 0. Would that mean I need to expand to Laurent series?
(it's not "really" homework, I am just playing around with black body radiation and radiation energy density to show that p[rad]~T^4 which we were given in class).

You do have the right idea about using the taylor series but splitting the integral won't be a very good idea.

$$J=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^3}{e^x-1}=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^3e^{-x}}{1-e^{-x}}\,dx$$

Now, from the following series expansion,
$$\frac{1}{1-x}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^k\,\,\,\,\,\, (|x|<1)$$
we can write:
$$\frac{1}{1-e^{-x}}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} e^{-kx}$$
Hence,
$$J=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} x^3e^{-(k+1)x}\,dx$$

Using integration by parts, you can eliminate ##x^3##. I hope this helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sunnyocean and ChrisVer
I think I found another method which doesn't involve the use of series expansions.

Rewrite:
$$J=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^3}{e^x-1}\,dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^3}{e^{x/2}-1}\,dx-\frac{x^3}{e^{x/2}+1}\,dx\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(I_1-I_2\right)$$

Proceeding with ##I_1## first, use the substitution ##x/2=t## to get:
$$I_1=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^3}{e^{x/2}-1}\,dx=16\int_0^{\infty} \frac{t^3}{e^t-1}\,dt=16J$$
With ##I_2##, use the same substitution to get:
$$I_2=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^3}{e^{x/2}+1}\,dx=16\int_0^{\infty} \frac{t^3}{e^t+1}\,dt$$
From the formulation of dirichilet eta function,
$$\eta(s)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_0^{\infty} \frac{t^{s-1}}{e^t+1}\,dt$$
$$\Rightarrow \eta(4)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(4)}\int_0^{\infty} \frac{t^3}{e^t+1}\,dt$$
$$\Rightarrow \int_0^{\infty} \frac{t^3}{e^t+1}\,dt =\eta(4)\Gamma(4)$$
Hence,
$$I_2=16\eta(4)\Gamma(4)$$
Therefore,
$$J=\frac{1}{2}\left(16J-16\eta(4)\Gamma(4)\right) \Rightarrow J=\frac{8}{7}\eta(4)\Gamma(4)$$
Since ##\eta(4)=7\pi^4/720## and ##\Gamma(4)=3!##, the final result is:
$$\boxed{J=\dfrac{\pi^4}{15}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pham The Song, SammyS and ChrisVer
both, thanks for the answers.
Pranav, Could you also check Post #3? and give me your "complains"?
One complain I would state for that is the arbitrariness of the function as going from 0 to 1 (I mean exponential would need more powers to be closer to the needed one, like 2nd or 3rd order), the errors at that points (1^{-}) would be over 100%...
 
ChrisVer said:
both, thanks for the answers.
Pranav, Could you also check Post #3? and give me your "complains"?
One complain I would state for that is the arbitrariness of the function as going from 0 to 1 (I mean exponential would need more powers to be closer to the needed one, like 2nd or 3rd order), the errors at that points (1^{-}) would be over 100%...

I am not sure if I can help with that. I can solve the integrals but I am not very good at doing approximations. I hope someone else can help with that.
 
nevermind, thanks anyway Shino kun, and the 2nd way was really nice :)
 
  • #10
ChrisVer said:
nevermind, thanks anyway Shino kun, and the 2nd way was really nice :)

Glad to help! :)
 
  • #11
Well my approximation yields:
\frac{1}{3}+\frac{16}{e} \approx 6.219401
While the correct answer is:
\frac{\pi^{4}}{15} \approx 6.4939394
So the error coming from the approximation is ~4.2%, so I guess it's not that bad...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K