How Can I Integrate a Ln Function Using Different Methods?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integrating a logarithmic function, specifically the integral of the form \(\oint ax \ln(x/b) \, dx\), where \(a\) and \(b\) are constants. Participants are exploring various methods of integration, including integration by parts and simplifications related to logarithmic properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods for integrating the logarithmic function, including attempts to apply integration by parts and breaking down the logarithmic expression. Questions arise regarding the correctness of derivatives and the simplification of terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the integration process. Some guidance has been offered on the application of integration by parts and the simplification of logarithmic derivatives. Multiple interpretations of the integration steps are being explored, particularly concerning the second integral related to the Navier-Stokes equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share. There is an emphasis on understanding the integration process rather than arriving at a final solution.

mjk1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have tried quite a few methods but haven't solved this problem, any help ?

\oint axLn(x/b) dx

where a and b are constants

I have tried moving the 'a' outside the integration and solving xln(x/b) using integration by parts . I have also tried splitting xln(x/b) into xlnx -xlnb and integrating that but I'm still having problems.

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like u= Ln(x/b), dv= x dx works nicely. Could you show where you have a problem with that integration by parts?
 
u = ln(x/b) => du/dx = 1/xb (is that right ?)
dv = x dx => v = (x^2)/2

using formula...

\frac{x^2}{2}Ln(x/b) - \int (x^2)/2xb

how would you integrate this step ?
 
mjk1 said:
u = ln(x/b) => du/dx = 1/xb (is that right ?)
No, it's not. It is [1/(x/b)] times the derivative of x/b or [b/x][1/b]= 1/x.
A simpler way to do this is to use the fact that ln(x/b)= ln(x)- ln(b). Since ln(b) is a constant, it is clear that the derivative is 1/x, independent of b.

dv = x dx => v = (x^2)/2

using formula...

\frac{x^2}{2}Ln(x/b) - \int (x^2)/2xb

how would you integrate this step ?
Surely you jest! "x2/x" is just x. You are asking about how to integrate x!
 
thanks for your help. this was a simplification of a Navier Stokes equation but I am having problem simplifying the equation after integration...

original Integral

Q = \int^{ro}_{ri} [r^{2} - ro^{2} + \frac{ri^{2} - ro^{2}}{ln(ro/ri)}ln\frac{r}{ro}]rdr

where ro and ri are constants

so far I have managed to break it down to...

\int^{ro}_{ri}[r^{2} - ro^{2}]rdr + \int^{ro}_{ri}[\frac{ri^{2} - ro^{2}}{ln(ro/ri)}ln\frac{r}{ro}]rdr

The first integral is straight foward but the second integral is a bit confusing

can the second integral be written as
arln(r/b) and solved ? where a and b are constants and then substitute the ri,ro for a and b after integration
 
nsequation.jpg
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K