How can I prove the identity using Taylor's expansion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the intensity formula for a three-slit interference pattern using Taylor's expansion. The intensity observed is given by the equation I(θ) = I₁[1 + 2cos(2πdsinθ/λ)]², where d is the separation of adjacent slits and λ is the wavelength. Participants emphasize the utility of complex notation to simplify the wave amplitude representation, leading to the conclusion that A can be expressed as A₂[exp(ikdsinθ) + 1 + exp(-ikdsinθ)], which simplifies to 2cos(kdsinθ) using Euler's formula. The discussion confirms that Taylor's expansion is a valid method for proving the identity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave interference principles
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and Euler's formula
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion
  • Basic concepts of amplitude and intensity in wave physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Taylor series in physics problems
  • Learn about complex notation in wave mechanics
  • Explore the derivation of interference patterns in multi-slit experiments
  • Investigate the relationship between amplitude and intensity in wave phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics and interference patterns, as well as anyone interested in mathematical methods applied to physical problems.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Three slits of width a and d (separation of adjacent slits). d << the distance to the screen. Show that the intensity we observe is

[tex]I (\vartheta) = I_{1} \left[1 + 2 cos \left(\frac{2 \pi d sin\vartheta}{\lambda} ) \right] ^{2}[/tex]



2. The attempt at a solution

For an angle [tex]\vartheta[/tex] we see that the waves from slit 1 and 3 must travel a distance dsin[tex]\vartheta[/tex] shorter and longer than the waves from slit 2 to get to a point on the screen.

Total wave amplitude far from the slits:

A = A1 + A2 + A3 = [tex]A _{0}sin(kx - \omega t - \varphi )+ A _{0}sin(kx - \omega t) + A _{0}sin(kx - \omega t + \varphi )[/tex]

Am I on the right track? How do I find an easier expression for A?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I should use complex notation here. How do I represent A in complex form? My book (and other sources on the internet that I've found) is not very clear here. My best guess is

[tex]A = A_{2}[exp(ikd sin\vartheta ) + 1 + exp(-ikd sin\vartheta )][/tex]

Can I then write [tex]exp(ikd sin\vartheta ) + exp(-ikd sin\vartheta ) = 2cos(kd sin \vartheta)[/tex]? Why?
 
Last edited:
1. You were actually right in your first attempt, except that you should square the amplitude and obtain the time average.

2. Yet, as in your second attempt, using complex notation is far easier.

3. exp(ix) = cos(x) + isin(x) can be used to prove the identity you want to use.
Above identity can be proved using taylor's expansion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K